Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Sat, 02 September 2017 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FAA132812 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 04:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4U84s9bdAWvA for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 04:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702E5132D60 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 04:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E73369A; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:28:33 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id Tis7kkHFlPs2; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:28:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.48]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA0F200E2; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qNK9Yxrp87_8; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED15200E0; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4E36B407AFCA; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 13:28:32 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: "Robert Wilton -X (rwilton - ENSOFT LIMITED at Cisco)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170902112832.ymorfgdthobeio6q@elstar.local>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "Robert Wilton -X (rwilton - ENSOFT LIMITED at Cisco)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <f7151a6b-9deb-52ad-62a9-78b29a552540@cisco.com> <20170830102902.2n5q6rgq2x2dxfq2@elstar.local> <e8482a9c-cba3-28e2-9ffa-ec5eb5c1c0a4@cisco.com> <20170830123156.cssrg5kklpo67fie@elstar.local> <CABCOCHTtN611FO2ov2kTLtZx-Q3=tzgH7Xk9uGvFUD1WuyMZyw@mail.gmail.com> <b13c5e9a-e9f9-96e9-8823-0402fb74af09@cisco.com> <1504223854014.55228@Aviatnet.com> <847e5bf9-7b3d-9ff8-9954-970f32a2094c@cisco.com> <20170902073342.xoziwor4tdr5bipw@elstar.local> <D5D00209.C5C67%acee@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D5D00209.C5C67%acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170714 (1.8.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/GJd_4jX8MUxdqbzh_DTOVL3EFEo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:28:37 -0000

On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:39:57AM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> 
> This is not an effort to change or bifurcate the YANG 1.1. It is simply to
> RECOMMEND a proper subset of XSD pattern that is more portable.
>

If you implement YANG as it is defined, pattern are portable. Given
this, I do not understand the notion of 'more portable'.

Anyway, it seems that those who want a more portable subset do not
even agree on what that subset is. Perhaps people pushing for this
should go and write an I-D that explains why a 'more portable' subset
is needed (which problems are we fixing), that defines such a 'more
portable subset', and which includes the reasoning how the subset has
been determined.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>