IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 05 September 2017 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDB61243F6 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mlfFieIhc0ma for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4646E12422F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw3 (unknown [10.0.90.84]) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD56175DE1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:37:23 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id 5xdK1w00X2SSUrH01xdNE0; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:37:23 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=F98nTupN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=2JCJgTwv5E4A:10 a=jSkAN_dlk0_1SahIaKkA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=91P3iDPv1jTqGNnDg9Lhw3NjLs97fLXd1f+3n2Kqhxw=; b=hsVw9rpyLCvd7jjHPw6mabHGYI VRUVy5l5iOu+KB3NHnRVUM3WSCPY6kNeOOr7TPkw3gNAY8OgmJ7PG3OwUdSCJJ/mFSiIS9J8w4a1Q 2XO4cp8KIdyBQDhIlCqXz8oBF;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:58250 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1dpLX5-000O1e-AA; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:37:19 -0600
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <f7151a6b-9deb-52ad-62a9-78b29a552540@cisco.com> <20170830102902.2n5q6rgq2x2dxfq2@elstar.local> <e8482a9c-cba3-28e2-9ffa-ec5eb5c1c0a4@cisco.com> <20170830123156.cssrg5kklpo67fie@elstar.local> <CABCOCHTtN611FO2ov2kTLtZx-Q3=tzgH7Xk9uGvFUD1WuyMZyw@mail.gmail.com> <b13c5e9a-e9f9-96e9-8823-0402fb74af09@cisco.com> <1504223854014.55228@Aviatnet.com> <847e5bf9-7b3d-9ff8-9954-970f32a2094c@cisco.com> <20170902073342.xoziwor4tdr5bipw@elstar.local> <D5D00209.C5C67%acee@cisco.com> <20170902112832.ymorfgdthobeio6q@elstar.local> <CABCOCHTC2MhBu0Zu44Z=f+J04HiENjQR+J0Sxy-arjcDmBHb_A@mail.gmail.com> <1e95ba5d-7aa2-e08f-56f9-27aa70822a11@cisco.com> <1504537140.5874.38.camel@nic.cz> <f0ddf7bd-c249-389f-e34b-0b901697307e@cisco.com> <1504629352.7175.40.camel@nic.cz> <8af6041d-7cd5-9608-70b4-7cffc4f884f8@cisco.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <2a70ce5e-7727-d280-98e4-481d87314d14@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 17:37:18 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8af6041d-7cd5-9608-70b4-7cffc4f884f8@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1dpLX5-000O1e-AA
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.84.20]:58250
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/qYDJQA0auIIOwdS4LGE9CeBRbuI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 21:37:26 -0000

Rob,

(as chair)
On 9/5/2017 1:17 PM, Robert Wilton wrote:
> However, I have thrown in the towel on my regex crusade.

I'm sorry, I've lost the thread here a bit. in order to guage consensus
on this topic, it would be helpful to send the latest text that you are
proposing for inclusion in the the bis.  If you are willing to do these,
we can poll to see if there is/is not support for inclusion of this
text.  Are you willing, i.e., can you send the current proposed text change?

Thank you,
Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email