[netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC7951 (7020)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 02 October 2023 14:33 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0200DC13AE22; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cw9KAjp9lcTO; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3145AC151099; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 17417E7292; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.si, lhotka@nic.cz
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231002143322.17417E7292@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 07:33:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Io7cTam8mnc13artAw6xwrUandU>
Subject: [netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC7951 (7020)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 14:33:26 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7951, "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7020 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Jernej Tuljak <jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.si> Date Reported: 2022-07-11 Verified by: Rob Wilton (IESG) Section: 6.8 Original Text ------------- An "identityref" value is represented as a string -- the name of an identity. If the identity is defined in a module other than the leaf node containing the identityref value, the namespace-qualified form (Section 4) MUST be used. Otherwise, both the simple and namespace- qualified forms are permitted. Corrected Text -------------- An "identityref" value is represented as a string -- the name of an identity. If the identity is defined in a module other than the leaf or leaf-list node containing the identityref value, the namespace-qualified form (Section 4) MUST be used. Otherwise, both the simple and namespace- qualified forms are permitted. Notes ----- The original text omitted leaf-list nodes, which may also be of "identityref" type. -------------------------------------- RFC7951 (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-10) -------------------------------------- Title : JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG Publication Date : August 2016 Author(s) : L. Lhotka Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Modeling Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC7951 (7020) RFC Errata System