[netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7317 (6245)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 02 October 2023 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948B1C157902; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uny6GQemit8R; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C41ADC151099; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id AC101E7292; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: maurizio.brigandi@sm-optics.com, andy@yumaworks.com, mbj@tail-f.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231002143738.AC101E7292@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 07:37:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/OsZJ1Q7Eexpd3foCUwMPyhCUw-g>
Subject: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7317 (6245)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 14:37:42 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC7317, "A YANG Data Model for System Management". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6245

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported by: Maurizio Brigandi' <maurizio.brigandi@sm-optics.com>
Date Reported: 2020-07-29
Held by: Rob Wilton (IESG)

Section: 6

Original Text
-------------
         leaf-list user-authentication-order {
           type identityref {
             base authentication-method;
           }
           must '(. != "sys:radius" or ../../radius/server)' 



Corrected Text
--------------
         leaf-list user-authentication-order {
           type identityref {
             base authentication-method;
           }
           must '(not(. = "sys:radius") or ../../radius/server)'
 

Notes
-----
As indicated in https://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116/#booleans

the following expression comparing a node-set with a string

       . != "sys:radius"

is true if at least one node in the node-set satisfies the boolean expression.

This is not the intention of the "must" condition.

It is necessary to use not(. = "sys:radius") to achieve the right intention of the check.

This errata has been marked as "Held for Document Update" because it requires a new revision of the YANG module to be published, and hence a new RFC.

--------------------------------------
RFC7317 (draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-16)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A YANG Data Model for System Management
Publication Date    : August 2014
Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Modeling
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG