Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Mon, 24 October 2016 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672AD12964B; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzUtEBT7XXJf; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D41B3129649; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10301; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477299439; x=1478509039; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Cps+hX/Xu1gGgXAw/SzGCS+qoEOzjCPopACvliuBOac=; b=PNGzm4+GF1oK98rHO1ZjP+YxKf1rGl8ME70k4ZHQEZS0K7aylhg4Ag9O DK4t3kvDMkCTNZ/uf4xYwidij+UAYIdVIzwB3n2y8U3y3HrEncA+p8Esh l6Skr4M6X2delAtg3j9BIR2NwK94Lj+X2mGbFwSqq/Ve6WNkWUUJywuA6 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A8AgD7yw1Y/xbLJq1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgnQ2AQEBAQF1KlMBjTOWfI8phRaCByeFegKCMBQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRjAQEEI1EFEAsOCioCAlcGDQgBAYhODrUAjQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEchj2BfQiCUIQZEQGDIIJbBZQ3hV2GKolpgW5OhB+DF4YQiTGDVYQBHjZQBgiFAz01hiCCIAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,541,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="689155930"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2016 08:57:16 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.88] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-88.cisco.com [10.63.23.88]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9O8vGjT020413; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:57:16 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
References: <56F686C0-FBDA-410B-A2AF-2048A5113733@juniper.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <d419ec95-6581-e8d3-9ca6-22cfc1ca9cde@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:57:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56F686C0-FBDA-410B-A2AF-2048A5113733@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5E4469A37698B9023116663E"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/IwBM9Ij-9V5K3W5RnPnP9twByG0>
Cc: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:57:22 -0000

Hi Kent,

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

Thanks,
Rob


On 22/10/2016 14:31, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> This IPR disclosure requests is being made as part of the preparation
>
> for WG adoption of this draft.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
>     "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> or
>
>     "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>     "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>
> or
>
>     "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the
>
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
>
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the
>
> IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware
>
> of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating
>
> in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For
>
> more information, please see the RFCs listed  above and
>
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
>
> NETMOD WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your 
> response.
>