[netmod] referencing the tree-diagrams draft
Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Thu, 07 December 2017 20:19 UTC
Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325491294E0 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:19:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ktzQ5DT_3kRt for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC6C12948F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108162.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id vB7KGU2m009983 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:19:33 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=CAw4M3Fg/rdbCacJbyEqgFO2H366Fvt4Y8aL2xqGmcI=; b=pWUBIeTBS97UJPylCi1AGqNWtG6hoUzgh05aVy0jM8QZ5aO1rmEyvtX2QOsR6e/s+1bI d1smufCnmqVzckvQFuMEMPVVPZ6p2ikgSLwbMWFOUfLuvgYAqHOcQU+Pvn1sFbsJB572 CxD4tgzdtG/HYRdnPNBjtCvocMahMgx6JhO3c5IJi/pX2hR+8y3wbRNX84aF883WqW// IioCFRPOy8UGiV7/WLZwoVwE/qwZqRhjZ06UKDKlYs6CJRw/n3Qvcuy39OjVRVms5tyk pZbjfERAUuzvRm7Xjeur8zyeb7oPSOsKY1EUM9zhXa6jZOB3cNJJL/2rCCeKyz6QbOKn Ig==
Received: from nam01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01lp0175.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.181.175]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2eqcfn00ug-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 12:19:32 -0800
Received: from BN1PR05MB280.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.64.153) by BN1PR05MB280.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.64.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.302.2; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 20:19:30 +0000
Received: from BN1PR05MB280.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::38c7:9ea8:b320:1eb]) by BN1PR05MB280.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::38c7:9ea8:b320:1eb%14]) with mapi id 15.20.0302.010; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 20:19:30 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: referencing the tree-diagrams draft
Thread-Index: AQHTb5iwyyNfFQtM5UimioeWnsDeDA==
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 20:19:30 +0000
Message-ID: <8999577A-227E-4F59-A4C4-23AED7AD8576@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN1PR05MB280; 6:wn34hfAX6G735hu0snWHic4At5jYXN5mCc7pQY78rdGDbsf1mW1WP6cKbtVFaYr0G1jJVs/A7OozekmQUejXvlWHkM7rcWM6VUYxK1eVfQRfvPzIitF9kO/uphoY4o1A6QT1gkscKujXx3VUfKFPb83tx8JR75AYyCl9HIZg7ww0dUGo4Mq3048MijRE+Fk8wLjpCfbao7z3Is6OBwwNR0LdXvCR0tnqbhXM2vD18Dokntrb72COSZlhQLyoXKwTmmhilhT7q4FgvaBZIl6pMJYvdY8EKVQCbuae0SAkhCkVbtbkkjGOie7wpaFooTr3gfC/I9vyNHhV2am5E6bT96czrShaXCWan4iGX+IGfmM=; 5:RwjOVlkCchrZ+iVndodqA4gkqqys4FvkmdB0mr5Kfyjo9+VSPxHGkggOaYVuCLQx7fedQEDemHCRe+qZejnP8CB6p5zEHy1XlzzIuT5KxjQi9NnzwL+k6P6hexPZ08bXoxdxpNUeoZQ5z28XtPfsQeLxyCJr09dKRPqATVEDhl0=; 24:I8hOIXLxTGQ1EXKxkLCEZZbPqNT748ZwaAyD5YLNca9flVomSWUq+zli5Hv9shFSL8JSN5w3ykRcurbhoTy0tnTc4Ib7akptja91Z8DfItI=; 7:dQhD/4VzDWfAJUk/Urgm1j6JpsQLDeM4lqaD2sCZ225ymRFiVXtOa1HpcMm5Tm7/Al4UtdOlfowrzIl3fzgKE8LCHNQ8w2B3KG/YCfYg9E3K/Qpflft/HudwaziDzUIPsHS5ypfQ095SmgYSIZLJfKoqoejxlw5hU/BDPOVSBWNTKBuSx12rMr0/FymUDhe4Syxb469bI0rLet0MxWabc3Mh7uZIIbp26LdyJ5xOT9jixFYK5pTV7kqE1xi2pbvb
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c188471c-f868-47d0-f0b3-08d53dafd2e1
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4534020)(4602075)(4627115)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(2017052603286); SRVR:BN1PR05MB280;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN1PR05MB280:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN1PR05MB28000614DEEEFD912F5C035A5330@BN1PR05MB280.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3231022)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:BN1PR05MB280; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:BN1PR05MB280;
x-forefront-prvs: 05143A8241
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(199004)(189003)(81166006)(1730700003)(86362001)(106356001)(8676002)(81156014)(6512007)(6306002)(33656002)(101416001)(66066001)(7736002)(2351001)(53936002)(305945005)(36756003)(99286004)(83506002)(2900100001)(68736007)(5250100002)(105586002)(5640700003)(6486002)(6506006)(6436002)(8936002)(3480700004)(3280700002)(966005)(478600001)(6116002)(83716003)(25786009)(3660700001)(14454004)(3846002)(102836003)(2501003)(316002)(97736004)(2906002)(58126008)(82746002)(6916009)(5660300001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR05MB280; H:BN1PR05MB280.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <74A9D4CDF808694EA8B4866291B3995A@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c188471c-f868-47d0-f0b3-08d53dafd2e1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Dec 2017 20:19:30.7980 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN1PR05MB280
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-12-07_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=924 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1712070297
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/K31RJCMyldvvbZBIXwXYvhotoxk>
Subject: [netmod] referencing the tree-diagrams draft
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 20:19:36 -0000
All, Looking at a few drafts going through last call currently, I notice that they all define their own "Tree Diagrams" section rather than reference the tree-diagrams draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05#section-1.1.1 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00#section-1.3 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00#section-1.3 I realize that the tree-diagrams draft isn't published yet, but my understanding is that its Last Call is imminent. With that in mind, *should* these three drafts (and, by extension, all drafts going forward) be updated to reference the tree-diagrams draft? - or are we currently in a grey area where it's a "may" until the tree-diagrams draft is published, at which time it becomes a "must"? Kent // co-chair
- [netmod] referencing the tree-diagrams draft Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] referencing the tree-diagrams draft Lou Berger