Re: [netmod] YANG module security considerations

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 21 December 2017 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339C812762F for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 02:16:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mczTkBjOeTe1 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 02:16:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B24F1200C1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 02:16:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1579; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513851383; x=1515060983; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1ar2AUsEoOJsPKNl5iRTG0rGolrP7zdPiZr3qJCybTU=; b=ah7irm7qBmpltcAnUm4hEQYjn2Aoc/z04MXD8WKCC45qWgSynMkDoFfO 5HJB+KkqqoFtFT2CUaNaMuhB+sK038FpH/WT9edJbv9SXGvI8CsjN5v7j 5n2MFYCVIc8mH55SW3QvBYLQrObJ+bxTSK23FZA5+yfGzu2FiFtaf5Qwp Q=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,435,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="1063531"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Dec 2017 10:16:21 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBLAGKcn031354; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:16:21 GMT
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, NETMOD WG <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <1512130382.9397.20.camel@nic.cz> <D6543BBB.E0E2A%acee@cisco.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <3fb3c5e8-5dbe-c950-f83f-777a78f9da11@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:16:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D6543BBB.E0E2A%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/OagNwTfxPE2BwSAowsc9-TLfhu0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] YANG module security considerations
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:16:25 -0000

Dear all,

The proposed change has been applied to 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines
For all document authors, please apply the new template.

Diff at 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines?action=diff&version=13&old_version=12

Regards, Benoit
> Hi Lada, et al,
>
> I haven’t seen any response to this. Your suggestion seems to me to be
> more technically accurate.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On 12/1/17, 7:13 AM, "netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka"
> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the security considerations template text [1] that has already been used
>> in a
>> number of documents is apparently incorrect - YANG modules aren't
>> accessed by NM
>> protocols. Hence
>>
>> OLD
>>
>> The YANG module defined in this document is designed to be accessed via
>> network
>> management protocols such as ...
>>
>> NEW
>>
>> The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that
>> is
>> designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as ...
>>
>>
>> [1] https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines
>>
>> Lada
>>
>> -- 
>> Ladislav Lhotka
>> Head, CZ.NIC Labs
>> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod