IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions-03

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Tue, 10 March 2020 03:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0FC3A0E3A; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BF8hE_46pvir; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 518783A0EE1; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id f16so2730718plj.4; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HMiIps8Co2KLjjF4gRjSAlBtsN2s4ExmwGvXeeOUT5U=; b=G5czyZFsr5f4utLQnZU99LgWxzn1ZqzEzERekdTq8AEcOGt0j53ZCLlGPQYjrKgAK0 QaxEbqAd38R9mLSbXsQk9kkudzt5fnm4SFk1aBUio2+8YeK9ze1NFS6/hBDvg1MlyPfv y1vrCWz2jovTiFAtLTPx1Mne1WNs7RA8KjUJ7kLkZu1/FacNsl18zFZoH/LjcQq7SOEY k5WDXkgBCvcKxIroyHwfQBjZzKRLg5299IL3yXbdBXwssJAMdjleZIBOe/MBqtOHFiA7 PheNnrM7TDCwuz82gXrLJzUkvXMmypOd99rWW9euxzuboCWZucl1d14+I/3Am27y/jJg 8XoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HMiIps8Co2KLjjF4gRjSAlBtsN2s4ExmwGvXeeOUT5U=; b=Sm4lOi2j6fpn4wYYCga7ADIXdpGhqugaISr5s4s/boHun/KiFOF6z4ZZrh/zB3oIaM KXl1nuDKnp579gEIiY6fiPQ4tnJDSt+/iTtX7sIELVAip5bLdQ0z44pjkZVInHkQUIxS tyuTNlEkY8qY+3eB+YfzwEltBiLPPbyyXRPv2O8Iwmds22AkqkDDTONuvi5AFA8AGhTz HcVySnDf2Ncbe4w/vmcRuNhlPb/vEHvdO7mN12U+yC4owqPg3KhAd0KrfzQFBVX5h7M3 m0N5dpapQMSjCQ4y1vp9n51kvfm4zP2KcCyfAn+qPbOZGDFMKKDsfMw/rQC61O913spA jexQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3fyO9+B8B1vLwtIIc8fqC8Fw8E0l1vO8bPdJ2Up9WJcz7JxABy XVe6KFko7fdTizf9WfMOCOU9W8bN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vujjf5Rbr2BLzPNROFF0lISGIsD7JZKBBUeo7q0pIxBEOh2TLbzDMykSQQ3Re/3UzRLJcuktw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:21ac:: with SMTP id q41mr2722949pjc.41.1583812309248; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:c66:ef44:8f0b:9230? ([2601:647:5600:5020:c66:ef44:8f0b:9230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 129sm21214188pfw.84.2020.03.09.20.51.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <415f837c-66e0-10b1-65a5-dc948ff23cbc@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:51:47 -0700
Cc: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, netmod@ietf.org, netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <280AE336-F186-4DA5-AB52-5B93ECA0940D@gmail.com>
References: <415f837c-66e0-10b1-65a5-dc948ff23cbc@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/QnduMZ-rkmFn3u-jPnQZlklairY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions-03
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:52:07 -0000

No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

> On Mar 2, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors.  If you contributed to the document please respond.  Alternatively, please feel free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to acknowledgments after WG adoption).
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> 
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Thank you,
> NetMod WG Chairs
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email