IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Thu, 03 October 2019 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF1E12011F for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RQvNyiM_c2OH for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51841200C4 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id f5so3451497ljg.8 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ctPiNGa4Kdg+qzhXrDBE1CMgUPJMj+760T0jDVHTxrQ=; b=RJ5TDV6QDRsA/KYO5vE8JQkc2FsMkjGv0MHDEld7vwFoQT3DeaGdzLBTh1OcxoabtM 0xEnYcZZddYCUBypz9C2A1oREJ6x3+xx0xoLbwwJJiZDzzIlylWB2dqCZatAQvvhXhsq TTGLAdRu4QIPcPKF6ormCfKBACCjvTUSphtKCsAGcZFZPPS93/+9d0n9cIJyea9LJ6bl hecUhKIVsh0tYCA/MpDVyZHoijSFXIpwtbUTzpvNrMhFohkp3pha88CFdotTe1fcFsDS aeI8MX/XYXnTvXFW6iigFcKJ0Ylyd3FYKvbddbxUsx7raveYeweP+Ig0ZZ8wj+mbTOpF i6Zg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ctPiNGa4Kdg+qzhXrDBE1CMgUPJMj+760T0jDVHTxrQ=; b=sZWrvTSZt6K/j9KcbJz0vl6hQn9FaTUrsVkQ2czCFybT5xR3Rdxxc+VniD8JR3HVqB /oCItw+bFuJ2ZbOQBgA7p9U/hftZwpCJQK11TOMLj2l/J635EtZD9Fw/oZoVguH9u92g +SwOZm1GiZpPecbNxvJurECO2pD+nNVF62ciy0Na6o8tN6nETI4aSLfl422xhWsPxeRG +kNO4ZVzeIoQIhBi43hYs39+6AuPzWprzGn3pwTFtaUDAdRRrKqIh4qf3ssAgkkgwEPy AWlDxRQAVcOovAztFQVWIP1MaJFyTJeMCg0Br3ItPEfKQG6YG0zatkgLMOOvu1gAgccj Y/kg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXV0lvr6jPZQB5sIUWX5Yl7umT8FbvsT05jywcSnkz2m7XSigO0 cZ2Q8WhOm13w/q+6QC0aXTOWzUxEfjMfkH1AwaPfIQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2Ssdx+kFIz1ISiVrYuh5Q2mY5HKA3RX6l8dt6Petol6shrSRPo0i2xEzJ/wESUGAAN7z9l6GQPPGDSsgYad8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d16:: with SMTP id t22mr5919113lji.207.1570119915017; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156942813583.28879.894232837346561087@ietfa.amsl.com> <8F9EDBC3-EB9C-452E-9091-03DBBC735CAB@chopps.org> <MN2PR11MB43662800E2F593864E130468B59F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <4ED3E9FA-9B58-4E9C-AA88-CFF4260A9E90@chopps.org> <MN2PR11MB43667363225E96A99C755036B59F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <643E9707-383F-4700-B206-6EAFEA0332F7@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <643E9707-383F-4700-B206-6EAFEA0332F7@chopps.org>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:25:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHS_uW2WTWDrWHAZuZ3=F7M4T_NehQGEPPVqHfqeEWXP9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Cc: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ca30ba0594040721"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/TQuqg8qtAxptfWpbkuaNBkJVV1o>
Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:25:20 -0000

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:59 AM Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:

>
> > On Oct 3, 2019, at 11:30 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
> >> Sent: 03 October 2019 16:16
> >> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
> >> Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>; netmod@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt
> >>
> >> [resending to include list cc]
> >>
> >>> On Oct 3, 2019, at 5:45 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Chris,
> >>>
> >>> As discussed offline, you have left out the "masked-tag" container in
> >> the "modules-tags-state" module.
> >>
> >> One might read this as an objection that was discussed offline, but I
> >> don't think you are objecting, you're just stating what happened,
> correct?
> >
> > Correct, not objecting, although I might be about to šŸ˜‰
> >
> > Generally, I think that is what is available in "module-tags-state"
> should be directly equivalent to what is available in the operational
> datastore for servers that support NMDA.
>
> So is this how we're supposed to construct these deprecated state modules,
> just copy all config true and config false nodes into a new module and mark
> them all config false? If so fine. I will do that.
>
>

IMO the deprecated state module only needs a config=false version of the
config=true NMDA nodes.
Since config=true validation statements are not allowed to reference
config=false nodes it should
always be possible to remove the config=false nodes from the deprecated
state module.

Otherwise the config=false nodes show up twice for non-NMDA clients
because they can
read the NMDA config=false nodes just fine.  (The NMDA transition strategy
is vague and
using the /yang-library tree to hide objects is too complicated, but that
is not in scope for module-tags.)


Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>
Andy


> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email