Re: [netmod] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with COMMENT)

[Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Martin,

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:50 AM Martin Bjorklund <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Spencer Dawkins <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: Yes
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > I really like that you've provided this capability.
> >
> > It might be that I've spent too much time doing Unix, but I wonder if
> > "Yang
> > Schema Mount Point" would be a clearer title?
>
> The WG had a couple of discussions about the title, even though this
> particular proposal hasn't come up.


Excellent - at least it wasn't a completely stupid question.

In addition to the term's meaning in Unix, "Mount" is probably used as a
verb more often in English than as a noun, so this is one of the cases
where not speaking English as my first language would have made this LESS
jarring. And that's a win for readers with other backgrounds ;-)


> I think the document is about
> more than just the mount point, so I think we should keep the current
> title.
>

Sure, and thank you for the feedback.

Spencer