Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with COMMENT)

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 11 October 2018 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC37130DF5; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44BWBe65TFAi; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21868130DDB; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.61]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF68C1AE0310; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:36:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:36:51 +0200
Message-Id: <20181011.103651.947203788475378121.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: suresh@kaloom.com
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount@ietf.org, joelja@gmail.com, lberger@labn.net, kwatsen@juniper.net, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <153922828107.5944.1683916629739613438.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <153922828107.5944.1683916629739613438.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/AvPuZcYX1htMG7L5wfQpo_DUuNo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:36:55 -0000

Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Section 3.3.
> 
> I think it would be nice to have some examples to illustrate the differences
> between inline and shared-schema and some guidance to pick between the two.

Some examples and a bit of reasoning is provided in A.2 and A.3.
Maybe add a reference in 3.3:

   Examples of "inline" and "shared-schema" can be found in Appendix A.2
   and Appendix A.3, respectively.


/martin