Re: [netmod] Comments on NMDA-04

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 28 September 2017 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14D21346BC for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 04:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IHaocujDyrdG for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 04:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C72631346B8 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 04:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1122; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1506597045; x=1507806645; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m86SolgX+D4JkiWJoXk1sTMNgxwOTFM5cGf5qxQnMDg=; b=O3GKpA7rLmxnPueuBZ8vBaQmuZU1CqwbFsMGx4mJZHDqI/Cep+aDvl5X 9NZKwgeT+5bkLjoX7BWclsduTZOa3aINHbhrh/qBx2xBM7k+dHUlkcvq/ vFwxUivTn6g8TKnGd0VpuwmIogBjePHvx9W/X6srQD9IT8iZMRyCmXIIU Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BxAQAA2MxZ/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBhEBuJ4N4ixOQYJYrghIKI4UYAoUpFgECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkBBSM?= =?us-ascii?q?PAQVRCw4KAgImAgJXBgEMBgIBAYotEKcEgieLAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?RsFgQ6CHYNTgWorgn2IF4JgBaEoh16NAotbhyuNdIdZgTkmBC1CTDIhCB0Vh2c?= =?us-ascii?q?/NokFAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,449,1500940800"; d="scan'208";a="655041036"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Sep 2017 11:10:43 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.161] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-161.cisco.com [10.63.23.161]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8SBAhhv013295; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:10:43 GMT
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com, netmod@ietf.org
References: <9ec6b2e4-36a7-87e6-59fa-828855235835@ericsson.com> <20170914.163239.143365521945928900.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <e7d87ee4-f0c6-efae-d36b-03dee3eff469@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:10:43 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170914.163239.143365521945928900.mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/awM1dc9wgr_y-eZfruyDjdcgxLw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Comments on NMDA-04
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:10:47 -0000

Hi,

This is regarding issue 
(https://github.com/netmod-wg/datastore-dt/issues/11): actions and rpcs 
should be allowed to include other datastores in their XPath evaluation

There has been no further discussion of this issue after Martin's reply, 
and this seems to be out of scope for the NMDA draft.  Hence the authors 
proposal is to close this issue with no change to the draft.

Thanks,
Rob


On 14/09/2017 15:32, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi Balazs,
>
> Thanks for your review.  Comments inline.
>
> Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>> Ch 5.1) IMHO actions and rpcs should be allowed to include other
>> datastores in their XPath evaluation. My suggestion is that they need
>> to specify it somehow. (Yang extension?)
> This is something that the WG has discussed in the past as well, but
> so far no concrete proposal has been made.  I think such extensions
> can be done in a separate document in the future, or maybe if we do a
> new version of YANG.
>
> But note that for rpc and action, this section only talks about
> XPath in input/output parameters.
>