Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-entitydt-netmod-entity

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 16 March 2016 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AB412D70D; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLAnZzyhgzR0; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0114.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E63912D63C; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=YAlYUH8VSD3hUOx2UpFkZV9nRRNtgCLI07HsmcOYKbg=; b=b980+Qq3JgldoPePajqrIdpBdcqAI1n5w5sNGDsgjrVKIBv8wlJx14CgxE/aIDVxVIHAgx2t+Mucnp37j98SB/dyl5Gqm7uplEuZUgykJv3pnprTm7JEX3T+RytG/RffGo9BDqwaWNir/k4HAO8nK0VMAPUx5k9cV4XyuSOghiQ=
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) by BN3PR0501MB1441.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.434.16; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:12:47 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) with mapi id 15.01.0434.019; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:12:47 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-entitydt-netmod-entity
Thread-Index: AQHRf7BxxemTCcwE1U6mVSvZjJQnep9cdyyA///5GAA=
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:12:47 +0000
Message-ID: <7C79E09D-D583-43D3-A488-13E1F86295E8@juniper.net>
References: <F9182F8A-52B5-4A78-A592-C93B99577EFD@juniper.net> <20160316.203729.1064760217658660830.mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160316.203729.1064760217658660830.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.160212
authentication-results: tail-f.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;tail-f.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7d60f3c4-ff07-427d-090e-08d34df07ce5
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1441; 5:wLHH+/WA8e2T2cxl6I4vQvtal9LR/AnLApcKRilwUQuBw8UuDBGvtTsWIOwQbIXXtPgtoDByUSKz2h3ECVMgnq2B6jt88ud6uv9nnq+gCRZY1QVveEgzWL3ZkYIdvwniLzL2WzUFhS2+ClpamfjU/Q==; 24:L1u/h/1rl8hpLMGDKDYe5zkB9AiApTFCQPmTGg2sHknSbLYehRN/S217fAKh3YbWB/WLPly22zMzL7Dm08IcN5vvd/VGg/6CxNziE6DPQi0=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1441;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB144129F6267688676CEF5BC0A58A0@BN3PR0501MB1441.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1441; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1441;
x-forefront-prvs: 08831F51DC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(479174004)(24454002)(377454003)(164054003)(36756003)(230783001)(81166005)(19580395003)(19580405001)(106116001)(86362001)(66066001)(83716003)(122556002)(99286002)(33656002)(5004730100002)(10400500002)(83506001)(82746002)(1096002)(1220700001)(5008740100001)(4326007)(2906002)(586003)(2900100001)(92566002)(2950100001)(102836003)(3846002)(6116002)(11100500001)(5002640100001)(87936001)(3660700001)(3280700002)(4001350100001)(50986999)(110136002)(189998001)(15975445007)(54356999)(76176999)(77096005)(7059030)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1441; H:BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9347CF7C96BB2D41B2C93E42A106246A@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Mar 2016 23:12:47.0840 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1441
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/bVwYHN1HrfI1nNauy1tIH3LKz3I>
Cc: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-entitydt-netmod-entity
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:12:52 -0000

My mistake, I simply copied that text from the referenced email without thinking about changing that text.  It would’ve helped if the template I used replaced “WG Last Call” with “WG <Last Call|Adoption>”.  

Lou, have you posted the template anywhere yet?

Thanks,
Kent






On 3/16/16, 3:37 PM, "Martin Bjorklund" <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:

>I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
>
>[BTW, you should change the text from "preparation for WG Last Call"
>to "preparation for WG adoption" or something.]
>
>
>/martin
>
>
>Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
>> [This regards the new pre-adoption process described by http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html]
>> 
>> 
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>> 
>> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?  Please state either:
>> 
>>     "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> or
>>     "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>> 
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?  If yes to the above, please state either:
>> 
>>     "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> or
>>     "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>> 
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>> appropriate.
>> 
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE’S TO LINES.
>> 
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> NETMOD WG Chairs
>> 
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
>>