Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-entitydt-netmod-entity

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft


Andy

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:

> [This regards the new pre-adoption process described by
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html]
>
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR that
> applies to draft identified above?  Please state either:
>
>     "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
>     "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?  If yes to the
> above, please state either:
>
>     "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
>     "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage
> until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor.
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE’S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the
> IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of
> IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in
> any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> NETMOD WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>