IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang

Tapraj Singh <tsingh@juniper.net> Wed, 16 March 2016 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tsingh@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06C812D624; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XaIGnVgwd1MR; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0786.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:786]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA81812D610; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=fSbjA8D2VXw9JnH5zelkr5jJmCGSTdeEyFhMqgp+QZc=; b=PiAshsUtkqb5IOcJIIBD+w0Nb7c+uXqDrlceWKbShkHQTdFly6PXYTToShfKAtr5WWGeI6R+8H9TnYWbprLmgKpQa4NCwBx/g+P0kXQNkGsaJy0xeRPW7rgwhFwPkHilfiijosc0oyiyds9NrSah6DoUSM9bXgOLd5IXBPBXboY=
Received: from BLUPR0501MB1761.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.120.28) by BLUPR0501MB0994.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.34.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.443.12; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:39:13 +0000
Received: from BLUPR0501MB1761.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.120.28]) by BLUPR0501MB1761.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.120.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0434.019; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:39:13 +0000
From: Tapraj Singh <tsingh@juniper.net>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang
Thread-Index: AQHRf7A+AZD2nUTCQUCEoTWNgXQELp9cZuXh
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:39:13 +0000
Message-ID: <356434E4-FF21-4848-BD32-8BC38D98CA9F@juniper.net>
References: <255CBF2A-E225-4B37-AE62-35D0BFC2BEFD@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <255CBF2A-E225-4B37-AE62-35D0BFC2BEFD@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: juniper.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;juniper.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [73.189.111.142]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cd60db38-a0fe-47a0-19d8-08d34dca45c2
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0501MB0994; 5:9rFPQgcwzq6M+DJOjn1nFe/lVprKFIDTIzLPcJuxBA4Gha3V0Q93Njy9gayINZq3VYuEwgfpobTYxho2WRSSVL58NhJeSbc+sbVWSwbfRUpZOk+Mbj9kSql7Pxy1lfisIt6XZw/AApbODl4ONI59Vg==; 24:KHvjJ1i35MErtOCbUSWsmezxISeXO1JBx8VMOvShIcFYVhz+XIRROv+3KIx+H53A92fRv8cGvbHc9VRdds/z3iwZQLMMLKYocKJaz4SfllU=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR0501MB0994;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR0501MB099454E4A985760EC25B553BDB8A0@BLUPR0501MB0994.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB0994; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB0994;
x-forefront-prvs: 08831F51DC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(24454002)(377454003)(53754006)(92566002)(3280700002)(36756003)(81166005)(16236675004)(110136002)(82746002)(2906002)(189998001)(122556002)(33656002)(5004730100002)(10400500002)(4001450100002)(3660700001)(5002640100001)(19617315012)(83716003)(99286002)(86362001)(1096002)(1220700001)(106116001)(87936001)(5008740100001)(54356999)(4326007)(15975445007)(76176999)(230783001)(11100500001)(77096005)(50986999)(2950100001)(3846002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(2900100001)(586003)(66066001)(6116002)(102836003)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB0994; H:BLUPR0501MB1761.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_356434E4FF214848BD328BC38D98CA9Fjunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Mar 2016 18:39:13.7712 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB0994
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/e2BKbTXDjJOkQ6ZhoPqo0i8SE8A>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:19:05 -0700
Cc: "daviball@cisco.com" <daviball@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:39:34 -0000

Hi all,
  I am not aware of any IPR.
I fully support this draft as a co author.

Thanks
Tapraj

On Mar 16, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>> wrote:

[This regards the new pre-adoption process described by http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html]

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?  Please state either:

    "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
    "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?  If yes to the above, please state either:

    "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
    "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
NETMOD WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email