Re: [netmod] Next steps for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis

Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net> Wed, 28 February 2024 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <0100018df05b125e-c717e95c-b062-4dab-9852-f8e00bf1a927-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD4EC14F61E; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 07:35:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tHd7U540exYE; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 07:35:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43A0C14F5E5; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 07:35:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1709134517; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=AeJS8nWPuQ/IBNixFwozeXZjVGRisguCDRI1nbmH6vI=; b=YQYT9qzdF/J3ehrW1ljtMI6cyW/FufkehYASGePsGDY4elE1H2VlAxe/1+xGOQcz YAAX6sliek1Gql9AtPbyPqnIkDM0JKksXqGAYi3524O/NGySS9UL3EXjk5kS31L4rJt RSkcdcCZTJNMOWxyrp0SjsUQdVY4PAgE0/ZEhAsA=
From: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100018df05b125e-c717e95c-b062-4dab-9852-f8e00bf1a927-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C7E8BA4F-C47E-4812-92FC-BB18C44264B3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:35:16 +0000
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR02MB10160D87F56348C8C6C3D947188582@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
References: <170911084467.36197.13909323798182085568@ietfa.amsl.com> <DU2PR02MB10160D87F56348C8C6C3D947188582@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.02.28-54.240.48.93
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/bqHKdP1FW-9Dsm5CTGG4EIFwg3I>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Next steps for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:35:20 -0000

Hi Med,

I’ve been slow to provide follow-up responses to you regarding the "Adherence to the NMDA" and "Security Considerations" sections, which I have refined even more since our last interactions here.

1) In the Adherence to the NMDA section, I know that I pushed before to invert the recommendation from before, along with a promise to then eliminate the section from all my drafts.  But then I looked at all my drafts and found that I was saying some pretty meaningly things.  I think that my current position is now “neutral” - that is, don’t say how it is NMDA-compliant (as all YANG modules SHOULD be now) nor say how it is not compliant (as none SHOULD be), but rather say what might be useful to say.  This may be unique to these drafts, as they partially depend on the existence of an <operational> datastore, which is define by NMDA.  To get a feel for what I mean, check out these sections:

	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types#section-1.3
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-trust-anchors#section-1.3
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-keystore#section-1.4
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server#section-1.3
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server#section-1.4
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server#section-1.4
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server#section-1.3
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server#section-1.3
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server#section-1.3



2) In the Security Considerations section, the template should be amended to have the following paragraph:

	Please be aware that this YANG module uses groupings from other YANG
	modules that define nodes that may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
	in network environments. Please review the Security Considerations for
	dependent YANG modules for information as to which nodes may be
	considered sensitive or vulnerable in network environments.


Below is top of mind, but I invite/encourage you to read said sections (and the IANA Considerations section too) in, e.g., https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server to see if I missed anything.

Kent


> On Feb 28, 2024, at 4:51 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> 
> Hi all, 
> 
> I think that this version is ready for the WGLC.
> 
> The document fully covers the items promised when requesting adoption [1]. As listed in the ACK section, we also solicited and integrated feedback from many yangdoctors, solicited SAAG WG to review the security text, etc. Refer to 1.1 for a comprehensive list of the changes.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> [1] Slide#7 of https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/slides-117-netmod-7-guidelines-for-authors-and-reviewers-of-documents-containing-yang-data-models-00 
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de
>> internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> Envoyé : mercredi 28 février 2024 10:01
>> À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
>> Cc : netmod@ietf.org
>> Objet : I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-09.txt
>> 
>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-09.txt is now available.
>> It is a work item of the Network Modeling (NETMOD) WG of the IETF.
>> 
>>   Title:   Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents
>> Containing YANG Data Models
>>   Authors: Andy Bierman
>>            Mohamed Boucadair
>>            Qin Wu
>>   Name:    draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-09.txt
>>   Pages:   84
>>   Dates:   2024-02-28
>> 
>> Abstract:
>> 
>>   This memo provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of
>>   specifications containing YANG modules, including IANA-maintained
>>   modules.  Recommendations and procedures are defined, which are
>>   intended to increase interoperability and usability of Network
>>   Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) and RESTCONF protocol
>>   implementations that utilize YANG modules.  This document obsoletes
>>   RFC 8407.
>> 
>>   Also, this document updates RFC 8126 by providing additional
>>   guidelines for writing the IANA considerations for RFCs that
>> specify
>>   IANA-maintained modules.
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata
>> tracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod-
>> rfc8407bis%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C51672231
>> 30c943a5a4c608dc383bce6b%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C
>> 638447076716455966%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjo
>> iV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=s5VX9Hb%2Fl
>> P9v5QurysF69syyEyba9yYss7xd7K5E2FE%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
>> ietf.org%2Farchive%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-
>> 09.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C5167223130c943
>> a5a4c608dc383bce6b%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638447
>> 076716464395%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM
>> zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Br3nHahSq8OV24f
>> hFxBkJaqY43Q0GUxcbPZSFhji4uk%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fauth
>> or-tools.ietf.org%2Fiddiff%3Furl2%3Ddraft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-
>> 09&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C5167223130c943a5a4c
>> 608dc383bce6b%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63844707671
>> 6470644%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLC
>> JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zo%2FrtFJrYJkJXOceIpzR
>> mlGAQF2c8m9Z%2F0vShl5o8gQ%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod