[netmod] escapes - WAS: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6536 (3862)

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Fri, 10 January 2014 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BA11AE061 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 06:31:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_CZ=0.445, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tX6lrFMmmXrm for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 06:31:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D513F1AE064 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 06:31:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.29.2.201] (nat-5.bravonet.cz [77.48.224.5]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3509D13FA79 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:31:29 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1389364289; bh=jgGomrIuAZEGzxxxf5tieULSgSDqLNxarit0l+oZVpU=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=wWya9VOWEwyZm+doqnX6VBi0D6YXPLMmiD7PtCxVdkEH9h2+sws6gaMzmKJbpPNgw ZZ5SuLDipRW9Sr3nBzUKXDOSkcPCQZ/I6qEcnGgdGNK5YbSnDj3MObUoj3a+pabcmW 6sNwXy5yNyFu24liE/7uKJ/+kbPtYMck/2PCiKJ8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <52CFFC73.3010002@mg-soft.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:31:25 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <44569F32-FD79-473A-90AF-71542E8D1714@nic.cz>
References: <20140110133233.926097FC394@rfc-editor.org> <20140110.144038.1958728126349068530.mbj@tail-f.com> <52CFFC73.3010002@mg-soft.com>
To: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: [netmod] escapes - WAS: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6536 (3862)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:31:42 -0000

On 10 Jan 2014, at 14:58, Jernej Tuljak <jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.si> wrote:

> If this is true, then it is RFC6020 that needs a clarification on this. Namely, that the "special character" which follows a backslash need not be special and that it does not represent an escape sequence in such a case.
> 
>   Within a double-quoted string (enclosed within " "), a backslash
>   character introduces a special character, which depends on the
>   character that immediately follows the backslash:
> 
>    \n      new line
>    \t      a tab character
>    \"      a double quote
>    \\      a single backslash
> 
> My reading is that a backslash starts a YANG escape sequence and may therefore be removed during string dequoting. A "\*" ends up as *, which is not equivalent to '\*’.

In XSD regular expressions, which are also used by YANG, it is an error if a backslash plus something is not defined as an escape sequence. So I think YANG should behave the same for double-quoted string, i.e. a backslash followed by something else than the four characters listed above should be flagged as an error (“illegal escape”).

Lada

> 
> Please move this discussion over to NETMOD it that's the case.
> 
> Jernej
> 
> Dne 10.1.2014 14:40, piše Martin Bjorklund:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This errata should be rejected.  "\*" is equvalent to '\*'.  \* in a
>> double quoted string is not an escape sequence, which means that the
>> characters are interpreted literally, i.e. the two characters \
>> followed by *.
>> 
>> The same goes for errata 3863.
>> 
>> /martin
>> 
>> RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6536,
>>> "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model".
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6536&eid=3862
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Technical
>>> Reported by: Jernej Tuljak <jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.com>
>>> 
>>> Section: 3.5.2.
>>> 
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>>      typedef matchall-string-type {
>>>        type string {
>>>          pattern "\*";
>>>        }
>>>        description
>>>          "The string containing a single asterisk '*' is used
>>>           to conceptually represent all possible values
>>>           for the particular leaf using this data type.";
>>>      }
>>> 
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>>      typedef matchall-string-type {
>>>        type string {
>>>          pattern '\*';
>>>        }
>>>        description
>>>          "The string containing a single asterisk '*' is used
>>>           to conceptually represent all possible values
>>>           for the particular leaf using this data type.";
>>>      }
>>> 
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> As per RFC6020, Section 6.1.3., a backslash within a double-quoted
>>> string introduces a special character. The only valid escape sequences
>>> inside a double-quoted YANG string are: \n, \t, \" and \. As \* is not
>>> a valid escape sequence, a single quoted string should be used to
>>> specify the offending pattern statement's argument. The quotes could
>>> also be omitted.
>>> 
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC6536 (draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-07)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title : Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model
>>> Publication Date    : March 2012
>>> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund
>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>> Source              : Network Configuration
>>> Area                : Operations and Management
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C