Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6020 (4911)

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 19 January 2017 07:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A454412940E for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:05:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1BfdQDf7dMP9 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:05:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E529127058 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:05:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:4832:4aae:79dd:a6d0] (unknown [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:4832:4aae:79dd:a6d0]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C405D60AD4; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:05:05 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1484809505; bh=l2mdxuDtc7v4CyaZXVYYLt3W077cgvgL0Yq8G8CeqoQ=; h=From:Date:To; b=Bfpo0SOhJ+Gx2M9Xinx5SPkAHTuSzBQ5do9QolukESjJS2llFOAVrEewgDTXFH26X ZCN1XRx+5iyn49kLeXsOlIatRrh+Kk1uzVhO2QaRNNSjuEdilBGJr8TBZRSDBNW+wd GVct4xb4yrJx/zmOzVcvRKNjTMb4CWkR5UC9HwPg=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <201701182108.v0IL8vRB039097@idle.juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:05:05 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <63EAB42D-76B8-44AD-8FD9-88B06B51A3BD@nic.cz>
References: <201701182108.v0IL8vRB039097@idle.juniper.net>
To: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/cbs0Iiqhya4OF0zt1o0u71Jsg6k>
Cc: joelja@bogus.com, netmod@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6020 (4911)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 07:05:08 -0000

> On 18 Jan 2017, at 22:08, Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> RFC Errata System writes:
>> \      a single backslash
> 
> Why isn't this "\\" like the other data ("\n")?

The second backslash was eaten along the way. On the errata web page it is correct.

Lada

> 
>> The backslash MUST NOT be followed by any other character.
> 
> Seems reasonable.
> 
> Thanks,
> Phil
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67