Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Agenda
Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 18:57 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B940D1A6EE7 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:57:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UGk-pRueVkLX for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:57:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com (mail-qa0-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0151A6F7D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:57:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id s7so2011152qap.0 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:57:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZJ+CZLsnh2WTaYjenqeZMGSo47wLjgR3AbVcs58FTdw=; b=cNDMAh6JpbFOqZCiEFiNE/ANUX6f5rL1lMEeQT65bRuETV54oawyegZkM60E3BhGOA YQPLcrbIQ2oOF/0rYMwHbk/GGhhQ72EdxyyeOybEpSgQPqNYcUCCpG6JJULkQGIyCIWH fMPvPt7wNvNm3H7m5RtQeVe/3aPdIksP3gznEERCCPuYt5aXkj2eQL/+vqTJhVUqOiSz hvKc3yNXtnoCLfPI3jjhw7zxWj6WVHBN0Ai2UFOV6Ep1Wnf8zAkDKNeNohLJP8KTSi7+ FbcyhemwdBxRLEzNskyNU7M3Z/Dg0F+4uG24gt52+Uwp1EtMfaf/b4Qt1z9FlmxHYLVL eY1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPMk/aA+Aq+EKW0w1RjERLcaee4B71SmNZ8kWZqu+/Q9j+iFUjygx6KV1uoxli/oyoUyUC
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.134.198 with SMTP id k6mr53229170qat.88.1415127450441; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.37.52 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:57:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAchPMsEcrwR452+0Os_N=qx5zGPCUk_v7_jaQfo3z=t5WUGnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CDE6BFE7-F1A1-4972-B75A-B9B510786136@lucidvision.com> <0AC1F16A-67FA-477B-8F4E-9DE293D9C746@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHS==dEWqPah+gv4YP2skdAUbvWoqh915SNpP34B_n_XcQ@mail.gmail.com> <5050899F-242D-4F95-8A6A-3FA88A482783@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHQFZgHHGncec3uow4m4dzcZaJ9hO5GQC3UhzMP5WDGaow@mail.gmail.com> <CAAchPMsEcrwR452+0Os_N=qx5zGPCUk_v7_jaQfo3z=t5WUGnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:57:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CABCOCHRap0OvFotf8eUZSJn=6ckxu3APug7_ZiPSQV+wiYFgVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/cpIpgvdfPPZwXHTxlTHJ7HX-jAE
Cc: "netmod-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Agenda
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:57:59 -0000
Hi, It is 1640 - 1910 : 2.5 hours None of these design teams working on NETMOD chartered drafts. IMO we should be focusing on finishing chartered NETMOD work. I don't agree these IETF WG meetings should be slideware forums to promote anything related to YANG. (There should be a meeting slot for this sort of thing -- something between a Bar Bof and a real BoF). Andy On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote: > Tom, the Thursday session is one hour long. The discussion of individual > design teams is 35 min. long not counting the time the chairs need to agenda > bashing and giving updates. Andy needs 10 min. for conformance and 30-45 > min. to discuss YANG 1.1. Seems we need to divide up 1.1 discussion between > Thursday and Friday leaving whatever non-chartered work for any remaining > time. > > On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 10:10:37 AM Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Nov 4, 2014, at 6:10 PM, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Thomas D. Nadeau >> >> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Sorry for replying to my own post, but I forgot to mention this >> >>> is an initial/draft agenda. Please comment/bash ASAP. >> >> >> >> I will bash.... >> >> >> >> It has been a tradition to discuss chartered work before >> >> want-to-be-chartered work. >> >> I see that is no longer the case. YANG "Peer Mount Requirements" is a >> >> contentious >> >> topic and will probably go over 15 minutes. Is this discussion >> >> limited to the YANG >> >> language aspects or will the protocol aspects be on the agenda as well? >> > >> > There are some in scope and some maybe-in-scope later parts of this. Les >> > discuss how best to structure the discussion. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> I notice YANG 1.1 is not on the agenda at all. >> >> I know Martin and Juergen cannot be there, but we have >> >> support for remote attendance and there are plenty of >> >> open issues to discuss. >> > >> > No one volunteered the section. Shall I put you down to lead the >> > discussion ? ;) >> > >> >> OK -- I will lead the YANG 1.1 discussion. >> Instead of a hour on 4 YANG mount drafts on Thursday, >> I suggest spending 30 - 45 minutes on the YANG 1.1 >> open issue list. >> >> There is plenty of time on Friday to discuss unchartered work. >> >> > Tom >> > >> > >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> --Tom >> >> >> >> Andy >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2014:4:03 PM, at 4:03 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau >> >>>> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> This is the current agenda I have to-date. Are there any other >> >>>> requests for discussion slots? >> >>>> >> >>>> --Tom >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Peer Mount Discussion/drafts 15 min Eric Voit >> >>>> evoit@cisco.com >> >>>> >> >>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements/ >> >>>> >> >>>> “Design Teams” update. 10 min >> >>>> jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com >> >>>> >> >>>> o List of all known “design teams” that are working on >> >>>> YANG models (especially ones that may be >> >>>> progressing outside of the IETF mailing lists) >> >>>> >> >>>> o Ideally a brief status update from one of the >> >>>> primary >> >>>> leaders/contributors (i.e. a few bullet points / >> >>>> 1-2 minutes) >> >>>> for each one (not to discuss the technical >> >>>> details of specific >> >>>> models – that could be other agenda items) >> >>>> >> >>>> YANG conformance issues. 10 min Andy Bierman Andy >> >>>> Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> >> >>>> >> >>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt >> >>>> >> >>>> draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 5 Lada >> >>>> Lhotka lhotka@nic.cz >> >>>> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01 5 Lada >> >>>> Lhotka lhotka@nic.cz >> >>>> draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00 5 Lada >> >>>> Lhotka lhotka@nic.cz >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Dana Blair dblair@cisco.com >> >>>> Dean Bogdanovic deanb@juniper.net 10 ACL Yang >> >>>> Model >> >>>> >> >>>> Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com 10 BFD Yang >> >>>> Model >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> netmod mailing list >> >>> netmod@ietf.org >> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Agenda Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)
- Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Ag… Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- [netmod] IETF92 Netmod Agenda Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)
- Re: [netmod] IETF92 Netmod Agenda Thomas D. Nadeau