Re: [netmod] current IETF91 Netmod Preliminary Agenda

[Mahesh Jethanandani <[e-mail]>]

Tom, the Thursday session is one hour long. The discussion of individual
design teams is 35 min. long not counting the time the chairs need to
agenda bashing and giving updates. Andy needs 10 min. for conformance and
30-45 min. to discuss YANG 1.1. Seems we need to divide up 1.1 discussion
between Thursday and Friday leaving whatever non-chartered work for any
remaining time.

On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 10:10:37 AM Andy Bierman <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Thomas Nadeau <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Nov 4, 2014, at 6:10 PM, Andy Bierman <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Thomas D. Nadeau
> >> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>        Sorry for replying to my own post, but I forgot to mention this
> is an initial/draft agenda. Please comment/bash ASAP.
> >>
> >> I will bash....
> >>
> >> It has been a tradition to discuss chartered work before
> >> want-to-be-chartered work.
> >> I see that is no longer the case. YANG "Peer Mount Requirements" is a
> >> contentious
> >> topic and will probably go over 15 minutes.  Is this discussion
> >> limited to the YANG
> >> language aspects or will the protocol aspects be on the agenda as well?
> >
> > There are some in scope and some maybe-in-scope later parts of this. Les
> discuss how best to structure the discussion.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I notice YANG 1.1 is not on the agenda at all.
> >> I know Martin and Juergen cannot be there, but we have
> >> support for remote attendance and there are plenty of
> >> open issues to discuss.
> >
> > No one volunteered the section. Shall I put you down to lead the
> discussion ? ;)
> >
>
> OK -- I will lead the YANG 1.1 discussion.
> Instead of a hour on 4 YANG mount drafts on Thursday,
> I suggest spending 30 - 45 minutes on the YANG 1.1
> open issue list.
>
> There is plenty of time on Friday to discuss unchartered work.
>
> > Tom
> >
> >
>
> Andy
>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>        --Tom
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Nov 4, 2014:4:03 PM, at 4:03 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>      This is the current agenda I have to-date. Are there any other
> requests for discussion slots?
> >>>>
> >>>>      --Tom
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>      Peer Mount Discussion/drafts    15 min  Eric Voit
> [e-mail]
> >>>>      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-voit-netmod-peer-
> mount-requirements/
> >>>>
> >>>>      “Design Teams” update.          10 min
> [e-mail]
> >>>>
> >>>>              o   List of all known “design teams” that are working on
> >>>>                      YANG models (especially ones that may be
> >>>>                      progressing outside of the IETF mailing lists)
> >>>>
> >>>>              o   Ideally a brief status update from one of the primary
> >>>>                      leaders/contributors (i.e. a few bullet points /
> 1-2 minutes)
> >>>>                      for each one (not to discuss the technical
> details of specific
> >>>>                      models – that could be other agenda items)
> >>>>
> >>>>      YANG conformance issues.        10 min  Andy Bierman Andy
> Bierman <[e-mail]>
> >>>>      http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-
> conformance-04.txt
> >>>>
> >>>>      draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16                5       Lada
> Lhotka [e-mail]
> >>>>      draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01                  5       Lada
> Lhotka [e-mail]
> >>>>      draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00            5       Lada
> Lhotka [e-mail]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>      Dana Blair [e-mail]
> >>>>      Dean Bogdanovic [e-mail]               10      ACL
> Yang Model
> >>>>
> >>>>      Mahesh Jethanandani [e-mail]     10      BFD
> Yang Model
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> netmod mailing list
> >>> [e-mail]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>