Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses
tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Mon, 20 July 2020 08:46 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E223A08A2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 01:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KBP2DyQx01nT for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 01:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30109.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66ABC3A0913 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 01:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NRVpc/z5Bp9XBzcWHXLdHX90KBaeBsl8vmqEgmaNp1+xnDQm3AFkTV1+v/R4hkSGRD404gwgRy92F0SaaPOcbsOz+Jm+ZkpkjomQ6SqtsOHVKUT7qpuYVybDI89OJJd6tK+OeEp9z3eInKLetZcVzDV/s0T4o055NuE6XFS6s0SHXrlcJ1uSQxO4pGIBZ91yaV/ahuv2AJECxMc37X1g0sM/1H4uYNEyAuPWxpTWXh+ry2r798D0wZJInu/91vioCotO9M2hDYNBowPEUTTQjALVBd98CfJEjRvM5YRm0Vc+SAcrkzZTAef450FyDIr0rywrkyh1na/7ggzx8iIsBw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mG2Q3MmldIqxgX9zUP9iU3hcNUnbfLKzkfGn8glkKxM=; b=ZmQldCXSRmjIZolC+z0WHijFqyteWG9xQHSeK46qym8Acv6zkoYTkHSO4psqMNRidhbMBV9NkLaY83UVqMIMFletAPLaYs4/ExCc+GUu2hZA5AJ+wUvmQf05Frdk9GnyPrh5xsHKESwubJm7snf7pI52ZuatBYJl4fAnwpvhAS7Fruhxpmg4mxnKZGbgE+/5atmuoJkCYUMsh+sruSJY5l3bi9CNhBgHmaXywW0dD8pEz3FgasfgL6ij6vHV6LXZizCAFCCu1yD1xVWE5j7mOsL9Dx4YEfpc0H23A0BUnuS8SVmRpC+rCDWa9R59ncWCMtMqttedFJDSRrE18H7qLw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mG2Q3MmldIqxgX9zUP9iU3hcNUnbfLKzkfGn8glkKxM=; b=WEuMfMBRLWEMigr3ijZS6Cy/CuY6FJWSHBVFr+3LPleM4vl2tiymy/LzlUxbszGd0kfLx7gcy5Z+xTLc/PAYwtJXLYz0PSPqoyapJCOKodaC8va1uolPcJ1dU6tF6DbaHRaUfCzL+7sSkHcO73pIqPXtJgM7Rx1PjHhW792qXvY=
Received: from AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:61::25) by AM5PR0701MB2355.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:203:d::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3216.14; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:46:37 +0000
Received: from AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d04:3a51:ec0d:9890]) by AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d04:3a51:ec0d:9890%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3216.017; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:46:37 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses
Thread-Index: AQHWXHAgpfprWxs6WkidzS2pA1jayakQKxun
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:46:37 +0000
Message-ID: <AM6PR07MB52220AD16FAC337D4F89A674A07B0@AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20200717192556.63e7gfbbrn2qyqzo@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200717192556.63e7gfbbrn2qyqzo@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [81.131.229.35]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3417ca7d-364b-4e96-0bd4-08d82c8969ef
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5PR0701MB2355:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM5PR0701MB23558DADB2DB3E941F9F9818A07B0@AM5PR0701MB2355.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: SKga+TmJbyEsct9vgU+6wCHhAgzQY8bqsE5I03zBJoIRVBd2LtG72vIINy3iuWOx/WQe+Yz/d/66OinBxUpjVo/Q7TeJrutZEi60JJRDBEHflyzJ7QJVoAL2+60zg+o80UiYAcMLT0MhE3bb1M/+VngrwawJiYTp3WuVjpgPuBdGoUAjJiZhjU7aP5Hqjg+li20UqoBRZejltwy6UfAg/1bEeMfCTypq5YPBo/A9NECiKjUtf26Ar3am1zH0P940HqJv3cVMz5lEJUtQyApzzNuula3Qxowncv892rDJnUarQyRkt3WHYFFPCd7oK1DTff5UUMMeygn/KBrXp5pJRb9wAMLgBX2U+0xpui6XxXRifGu9ved67XSFJBuvBwgxcVaN3A1bVIrpdwSKc2rUrg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(346002)(83380400001)(9686003)(966005)(55016002)(83080400001)(478600001)(66556008)(66476007)(64756008)(91956017)(76116006)(66946007)(66446008)(86362001)(8676002)(8936002)(110136005)(6506007)(316002)(7696005)(33656002)(5660300002)(52536014)(71200400001)(186003)(26005)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: HX6VzXxbwqrwVFVbPeroYO4hSkth/fbdy+zwMnkX0dm0s3BzwSblkyXNXTGoD9QxUv+agmSUK2vl+ZIDs+p+hui0yDYOZ6/e9HS8FSioBFmzJQWavIw1yK3hJrIzLdnzTcuOU900RcW5dqMZipecPoDesMr/7/LNPErauAg/rOpcDcI4cYNWti5CkjMxHfB4fAkZkvtwxpbHdLYEJxSm+KZXiWWjGANQkahUK+lCZOflzl9V7A7n6JKm5YowYbjovuDB3+kv2JUJJoI/9Y3QZ1wq/wy2tX4w+hs8ltxfMtdA46bnw82AuGZN4aCpdcyNuqU1ynZ+KX3Mtl7cNhnkjgkpelIze3a2IR8dZGPN2wksNXpyyQIDshnsYYsvALQSVwf85JLizLxyBMakDr0RHtxMxg2Mtc8hUbeASu0iJOEmYTPhAwzEo5RD12yTeBWKrW9CXnpxgG2ubuSm5WX78eX06oWT+jO8oBvulSZL/4o=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3417ca7d-364b-4e96-0bd4-08d82c8969ef
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Jul 2020 08:46:37.0821 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: xgBRWarFneglhxDQhm8wD0joEmsPZcXPpTPnYVdBbArNA6eijRtIgCTOlLVRXSDRireWZmvYxYIqK+DJyfwovw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0701MB2355
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/RFJPSp1F6I_WzgzAWZ8mNeMWIg4>
Subject: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:46:43 -0000
I am not a fan of loopback seeing it as the implementation choice of one manufacturer. On the other hand, the IETF has defined documentation addresses which many if not most writers of examples for YANG modules seem unaware of so if we add anything, I would add those. Tom Petch From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Sent: 17 July 2020 20:25 - There was a request to add types for loopback addresses (127.0.0.0/8 and ::1/128). - This is related to an effort to define a YANG module for MPLS LSP Ping (RFC 8029) but the details are unclear, i.e., what is exactly needed and how such a type will be used and whether there is a common need for types for loopback addresses. - Proposal: do not add such types at this point in time -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Erik Auerswald
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch