Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15.txt

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 17 January 2018 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD6612D77B for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:45:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vMO_5-oZuLNE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:45:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8AD12D778 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:45:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108159.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0HLj3ea016375; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:45:20 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=DFnbQr16edHoWjdoFO689zR+JTKFTz2ROwxM6UX50Ks=; b=FXl7bfMJ0ik5fjbRRiJLQqouM73Rzip4WRSykNjhlrraxSZ3+mmXUGEAiTFlYPQAaRgN FFfsBXHc1pitKj3uvOXbCwvuDbrQQKmK4fq6A+4XdmW/I/lyXwAdKJaal9YZl9YFWVlD UMrfouCvcdSKmUX3i6v00IpjtvAoB4rJMGcTJV1yhKobrD/GNiVRLzdPj0O3gd3tiPIy wURyD+/yAPs1DfJtaUHML+rIMu+dLPJ7zoRDD9kb1hE3QhWBwTDkYoCmzPG5+RRt08qC GFsKRXn3RW+iv9W+Z+pT39gwBik0W4dWito5faV4qRhm9uxRo9IDM2AyYC9VuR8MLSw/ iA==
Received: from nam01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01lp0178.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.181.178]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fjefe80w0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:45:19 -0800
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.240.147) by DM5PR05MB3067.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.218.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.428.9; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:45:18 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.240.147]) by DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.240.147]) with mapi id 15.20.0428.014; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:45:18 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTj0EIB+dmOB/YRU2JZXs+lEM9h6N3ZM4AgAET1YD//833AA==
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:45:18 +0000
Message-ID: <955981BF-70F6-4520-B7EA-0A90EA6EE1A6@juniper.net>
References: <151615867250.15562.7858111799192763218@ietfa.amsl.com> <411FD00B-42CD-4108-AC45-72CFA2A392D3@gmail.com> <61aba7cb-d677-9673-9d4c-21ebf0cc226a@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <61aba7cb-d677-9673-9d4c-21ebf0cc226a@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3067; 7:ppulmGpC55dJ8yuIe1R2j09t35FQpgtA7huvM+6ShvGdn3gV86SEaYi1JlqQLGrgtGmkXYnT+A/vrtoxy9znbspc5ry1q0vGGuqln5QQ8V5jnPEZRLKv/FBtWUCzuR/7EArfp0T0q500Yfv/vVDZ2F4j0EY7aGVwWjUgcziUZbVgSKjWv0/W/gmC4nDupVC3qncMragn15k8Za7zBCu4JRruWxqevrlRzCvE6kkRZZ8/kkhWwMfBxTkK60Cy+G4S
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 531c1218-fe7e-45db-c894-08d55df39a2e
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534125)(4602075)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3067;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB3067:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB3067E31E0F8CAADD86125D45A5E90@DM5PR05MB3067.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(85827821059158);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(3231023)(2400048)(944501161)(6055026)(6041268)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3067; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3067;
x-forefront-prvs: 0555EC8317
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(39860400002)(366004)(39380400002)(396003)(346002)(199004)(377424004)(189003)(51444003)(478600001)(58126008)(305945005)(6506007)(7736002)(59450400001)(2950100002)(316002)(3660700001)(3280700002)(105586002)(102836004)(39060400002)(36756003)(6246003)(106356001)(53546011)(82746002)(76176011)(229853002)(33656002)(8676002)(6306002)(14454004)(230783001)(81156014)(966005)(53936002)(81166006)(6436002)(5660300001)(6116002)(83506002)(6486002)(66066001)(3846002)(26005)(86362001)(25786009)(83716003)(110136005)(68736007)(6512007)(2906002)(8936002)(99286004)(2900100001)(97736004)(77096007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3067; H:DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: M1OPVaXkwEQ40p0u8uA4+7xY2HKq/NLrx1Adt1X+pwXNf2Pj0EYtQOM4JGdzwT3tdrpZGj0KTA9rbDUWW9LybA==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <AC5E9EC1874FAB41940CAD3840EDA263@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 531c1218-fe7e-45db-c894-08d55df39a2e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Jan 2018 21:45:18.7205 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3067
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-01-17_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1801170295
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/hOujjItviT62eVH8IUNNJQ0SmBs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:45:26 -0000

Yes, good job Mahesh and team!

My previous Last Call closing message [1] said that we'd evaluate if that Last Call was successful or not based on the result of the ensuing discussion regarding the model's structure.  As the diff [2] for this update shows, the draft has changed significantly since then, such that I think that another Last Call is needed.  I will start it now.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/lX4LBQTfNp3grwDX1-KNvsuEI9E
[2] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15

Kent // shepherd



===== original message =====

Thank you Mahesh for taking everyone's feedback, showing a lot of
patience, and having to do this under what can only be described as
trying circumstances.  May I now ask the chairs what their next step
is?  This draft was intended to be in response to LC comments.

Eliot


On 17.01.18 04:17, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> This version of the drafts addresses comments received during the last run of the LC. We, the authors, believe that this document is ready for LC.
>
>> On Jan 16, 2018, at 7:11 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
>>
>>        Title           : Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model
>>        Authors         : Mahesh Jethanandani
>>                          Lisa Huang
>>                          Sonal Agarwal
>>                          Dana Blair
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15.txt
>> 	Pages           : 51
>> 	Date            : 2018-01-16
>>
>> Abstract:
>>   This document describes a data model of Access Control List (ACL)
>>   basic building blocks.
>>
>>   Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)
>>
>>   This draft contains many placeholder values that need to be replaced
>>   with finalized values at the time of publication.  This note
>>   summarizes all of the substitutions that are needed.  Please note
>>   that no other RFC Editor instructions are specified anywhere else in
>>   this document.
>>
>>   Artwork in this document contains shorthand references to drafts in
>>   progress.  Please apply the following replacements
>>
>>   o  "XXXX" --> the assigned RFC value for this draft both in this
>>      draft and in the YANG models under the revision statement.
>>
>>   o  Revision date in model needs to get updated with the date the
>>      draft gets approved.  The date also needs to get reflected on the
>>      line with <CODE BEGINS>.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>