Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted
Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net> Tue, 12 March 2024 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <0100018e338cd691-8092a003-a863-4914-b9d5-c32d077cd559-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0DAC14F696 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jXUvsJF5B2JC for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023FDC14F5E6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1710261852; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=HcdUQSpNGOmYuz9j7iSOZYAHFdUr+uTk/wiE+dB406E=; b=uTplQa+klumihkYSMyHZjMiMpr/0oplPJpH10LYwCMqjR333VrGdCrym/3nIzJVD 8Olz4WCF9hXOOLA5PrtZ5G7jsgFTf5C7/lB4z+2WfgBr1afCwFwfTAX5qNysGh77l2F z/AF4RJVztrIGwL0wwKGGEv+BKK7MbNY6BQD1t4I=
From: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100018e338cd691-8092a003-a863-4914-b9d5-c32d077cd559-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B1F56F70-5EF1-4F78-9F96-9EE42CC51CEC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:44:11 +0000
In-Reply-To: <2A107F4D-E1A7-4638-848F-BBB5FE030768@cisco.com>
Cc: "maqiufang (A)" <maqiufang1=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
To: "Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)" <jlindbla=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <SN6PR08MB48476A8A05B9D29691CE4A939B202@SN6PR08MB4847.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <87a54464-97a3-4fbb-bff3-5bfbdd9775a3@labn.net> <2187a0c7e0544e729130ef8d26f8a686@huawei.com> <2A107F4D-E1A7-4638-848F-BBB5FE030768@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.03.12-54.240.8.96
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/hdok2fEYR6VoCHrNsMuVME1N5qA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:44:17 -0000
Hi Jan, you attended the Interim on Jan 23, and didn’t object to the Minutes [1] that say: The consensus in the room was a new "Option 4" - i.e., this document doesn't say anything at all about the validity of <running>. That is, fully rely on existing 7950 and 8342 statements. This leaves it up to interpretation. Has something changed since then? [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-interim-2024-netmod-01-202401231400/ Kent > On Mar 12, 2024, at 12:15 PM, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) <jlindbla=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Qiufang, > > I'm sorry to say I'm strongly against WGLC at this time because of point #2 below. > > One of the great contributions to network automation that YANG has brought is that clients now have a fair chance at computing a desired configuration change for a network element. Maybe we need to develop a more elaborate model for configuration consistency relative today's "The running configuration datastore MUST always be valid", but have I trouble with us stirring up multiple interpretations and then staying silent. That's not the way to build interoperability. > > IMO we need to sort out what the rules are before we come close to WGLC, or else the grief outweighs the gain. > > Best Regards, > /jan > >> On 12 Mar 2024, at 03:44, maqiufang (A) <maqiufang1=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, chairs, >> >> For system-config draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-system-config/), the authors have submitted a new version to reflect the outcome of the interim, the main updates are following: >> 1. Address the "origin" issue >> a. The current document explicitly states that system configuration copied from <system> into <running> have its origin value being reported as "intended" and update the examples accordingly >> b. Also, update the definition of "intended" origin identity in 8342 to allow a subset of configuration in <intended> to use "system" as origin value >> c. The current document states data migration is out-of-scope except that gives a couple of implementation examples in section 4.2 (please feel free to propose text if you have better suggestion) >> 2. validity of <running> alone >> a. The current document is silent on this point. Related statements which requires referenced system nodes must be copied into <running> are removed. >> 3. Other updates >> a. Usage examples refinement, e.g., fix validation errors, remove redundancy for conciseness >> >> There is currently no open issues, thus the authors believe this draft is ready for WGLC, but this might be worth a broad review on the mailing list. >> >> Best Regards, >> Qiufang >> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger >> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2024 9:44 PM >> To: NETMOD WG <netmod@ietf.org> >> Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted >> >> **IMPORTANT** >> >> Authors of WG documents, >> >> If your document has not yet been submitted to the IESG for publication *and* your draft is not on the agenda, please either: >> (a) request to present status or >> (b) send email to the list summarizing status by end of day (any TZ) Friday, March 15. >> >> In either case, please include recent changes, open issues, plan to resolve open issues/complete the document. >> >> Thank you! >> >> Lou (and Kent) >> >> On 3/7/2024 3:53 PM, Jason Sterne (Nokia) wrote: >> Hello NETMOD WG, >> >> A draft NETMOD agenda for IETF 119 has been published. Please review and let the chairs know if any changes are needed or additional topics should be covered. >> >> The agenda is pasted below, but here's the link to the always-current version: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/agenda-119-netmod >> >> Presenters: please provide slides to netmod-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:netmod-chairs@ietf.org> no later than Sunday March 17 (any time zone). >> >> Thanks, >> Jason (+ chairs Kent and Lou) >> >> Draft Agenda for the NETMOD 119 WG Session >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/agenda-119-netmod >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/session/netmod >> >> Session: >> Thursday, March 21, 2024 >> 13:00-15:00 Brisbane (Australia - Eastern Time) >> 03:00-05:00 UTC >> 23:00-01:00 Wednesday March 20 America - Eastern Time >> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20240321T030000&p1=47 >> >> Room: M2 https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/floor-plan?room=m2 >> >> WG Chairs: >> Lou Berger (lberger at labs dot net) >> Kent Watsen (kent plus ietf at watsen dot net) >> >> WG Secretary >> Jason Sterne (jason dot sterne at nokia dot com) >> >> Available During Session: >> MeetEcho: https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/ietf119/?session=31987 >> Onsite tool: https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/onsite119/?session=31987 >> Audio Only: https://mp3.conf.meetecho.com/ietf119/31987.m3u >> >> Available During and After Session: >> Notes: https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-119-netmod?both >> Slides: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/session/netmod >> Zulip (chat): https://zulip.ietf.org/#narrow/stream/126-netmod/topic/ietf-119 >> Drafts (TGZ): https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/agenda/netmod-drafts.tgz >> Drafts (PDF): https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/agenda/netmod-drafts.pdf >> Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/netmod/about/ >> ICS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/session/31987.ics >> >> Available After Session: >> Recording: http://www.meetecho.com/ietf119/recordings#NETMOD >> Jabber Logs: https://www.ietf.org/jabber/logs/netmod >> >> 1) Session Intro & WG Status (10 min) >> Presenter: Chairs >> >> Chartered items: >> 2) YANG Versioning Update (40 min) >> Presenter: Rob Wilton and Joe Clarke >> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-11 >> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-14 >> >> Non-Chartered items: >> 3) Validating anydata in YANG Library context (10 min) >> Presenter: Ahmed Elhassany >> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-aelhassany-anydata-validation-00 >> >> 4) Philatelist and YANG time-series db (10 min) >> Presenter: Jan Lindblad >> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lindblad-tlm-philatelist-00 >> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kll-yang-label-tsdb-00 >> >> 5) A YANG model for Device Power Management (10 min) >> Presenter: Tony Li >> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ivy-power-01 >> >> 6) YANG Full Embed (10 min) >> Presenter: Jean Quilbeuf or Benoir Claise >> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jouqui-netmod-yang-full-include-01 >> >> 7) Applying COSE Signatures for YANG Data Provenance (10 min) >> Presenter: Diego R. Lopez >> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance-02 >> >> Unallocated time: 20 min >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted Jason Sterne (Nokia)
- Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted maqiufang (A)
- Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)
- Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)
- Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted maqiufang (A)
- Re: [netmod] Draft IETF 119 NETMOD Agenda posted Andy Bierman
- [netmod] IETF 119 NETMOD: presenter slides please Jason Sterne (Nokia)
- Re: [netmod] IETF 119 NETMOD: presenter slides pl… Diego R. Lopez