Re: [netmod] IPR call on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-18

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 26 April 2018 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8073412D95E for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cF1IAhwpKrt2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD1212D7F8 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id e12so14490710pgn.9 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SYFtvUPUnYdm28EDOCzfnGzrt9r0zVsQwQ9X/qqrclU=; b=OXZTY/p3LtNCuvp4mOPJrsvOv7DHOfuHWhsmBY3wD4fZqVcFi3Oen/1oHmmFAFP5Ur j+ky3BAG3CuQ+vIHMIW3KHaHKsSw2xmx4gNcDkq7azCs5+2sgF4Zr9lgtGzrfwuUdsBM P8HYxs6hktEky9p3uCeAcXihXburc8rd/TVINtlVKJwuG3rZNP94ql342XLx26QRcnZ9 LI50m9uXssJ8Y1hqmowvfAO/S35Dxk/eCKTIiyIYoCS3JSf74XS8vcv4aHvrPnKf0XQ5 pKLNB6h+h0kZ1MbQVFHSjJdgFj5JWWUJ7UoQCSqeEgxzuaheYArWLYY5LySwmdtqx4+1 DBeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SYFtvUPUnYdm28EDOCzfnGzrt9r0zVsQwQ9X/qqrclU=; b=ieBcni3eoW0RdAFQv5Ju960Miohw0XdDRDiZIt2ItbL/vgsJFEovi59Aiuk2N0rbeE BZnexKcj7iswbN77tw7Dzo9p/0Fj4mBI6klh6IuIyMvnW8oaI6iIXReGUYdbPPviaIB1 rO64xvKdVcLlssR+So2gFCYuBnxDsOHTSkAllV0CyiPlBOVuM63PNxSd7eyXXaPzfURd B+aG0g2o/FhY1AeLle2cDQ99CrEraVCvNip+Iwp5iSMdJnY1I2RaPq02Fp9RSfUZys7H TrhiuIbosSaJMq1YGk8XirqE9DVr+iiJQZ2S4DJOLinA2IS0+zch+tITOrL0oC7SIcsd 28Qg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBcoqnVaql+vVj2jR0DvoIacqhkKhOXE+ohNME46QtVzyL39C4I 1jfZvCO1QV1bdqjyQvfEF7c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/L10SMUeJDAPCfeiTbXB0m8rEwWK6Kt9GXSFBx6ukYb/TO2JY4+U9TQ0zP7lLQkNASN/F0vg==
X-Received: by 10.99.124.21 with SMTP id x21mr25208663pgc.209.1524701433739; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4700:1280:1472:5de2:3242:8a08? ([2601:647:4700:1280:1472:5de2:3242:8a08]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z78sm44269526pfd.23.2018.04.25.17.10.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A20A2CD2-FD21-48C9-8F6F-F4189F1C59E8@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:53:57 -0700
Cc: "lyihuang16@gmail.com" <lyihuang16@gmail.com>, "sagarwal12@gmail.com" <sagarwal12@gmail.com>, "dblair@cisco.com" <dblair@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2DD76A9C-4A88-4B0E-80D1-55719B31DCDA@gmail.com>
References: <A20A2CD2-FD21-48C9-8F6F-F4189F1C59E8@juniper.net>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/iEe3GXg6rrM4XLMxgFWIbPEyppk>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IPR call on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-18
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:10:36 -0000

No. I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks.

> On Apr 25, 2018, at 4:16 PM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As part of Shepherd write-up for the acl-model draft, we need to ensure that all IPR has been declared.  There was an IPR-call before, when there was a different set of authors involved, but not since, so it seems prudent to do another call now. 
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> 
> 
> Please state either:
>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> 
> If yes, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? Please state
> either:
>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.
> 
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
> 
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the
> IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware
> of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating
> in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For
> more information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Kent // document shepherd and co-chair
> 
> 
> PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
> 
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com