Re: [netmod] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09: (with COMMENT)

Alexander L Clemm <ludwig@clemm.org> Fri, 06 August 2021 18:44 UTC

To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
References: <162609649382.9016.4775141501794218285@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Alexander L Clemm <ludwig@clemm.org>
Message-ID: <5329b9e4-8b88-a995-386a-cfca15d48827@clemm.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:43:57 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <162609649382.9016.4775141501794218285@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ikA8vvtlvTUUAiAaX9ng2wEGsbY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Hello Lars,

thank you for your review. I have changed the sentence in section 1 para
2. 

The reference to RFC 6991 is referenced by the YANG module, hence
included in the citations. 

I have updated the URL to the non-deprecated one. 

Kind regards

--- Alex

On 7/12/2021 6:28 AM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker wrote:
> Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
> address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
> automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
> will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
> did with these suggestions.
>
> Section 1. , paragraph 2, nit:
>> s both applied configuration data as well as status and statistics. As a resu
>>                                   ^^^^^^^^^^
> Probable usage error. Use "and" after "both".
>
> Section 6. , paragraph 2, nit:
>> ormat): HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2019 20:56:30 GMT Server: example-s
>>                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> The date 26 Jan 2019 is not a Thursday, but a Saturday.
>
> Uncited references: [RFC6991].
>
> These URLs point to tools.ietf.org, which is being deprecated:
>  * http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netconf/
>
> These URLs in the document can probably be converted to HTTPS:
>  * http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netconf/
>
>
>

[netmod] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf… Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Re: [netmod] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-… Alexander L Clemm