Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations
Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Fri, 15 January 2016 14:10 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60921B2D5B for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:10:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZSHrCXQXPG7Q for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:10:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC56A1B2D54 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id m198so136004218lfm.0 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:10:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fUjveHlGgNm/diVV0NMamOqX4Ql3U0cQQBkf82Pas8o=; b=bw/amoFfFzAhSQ1g+G+yN5Ikwg2sGvICZ1vOjU0cV8pmsE4rIriKv7k+BbBYCrDyxT Bm5fnT4BGgjyTSgIPwTOieQn/CYl67ZnJ5XnDorRAlm3UhN13PEkQq4+w4Ie7mohY7nn zISzzVikffup6vGY+60gsAHWorxEkqk917rcXLDQDw7M+mQ1FYbyO40okz90CzL0LHyQ qHA8XC9WkDEpKKsVbWOBicPPV67oOuOT7WdWLMlgu9SL6UGhRBjPHemVqTEepQGEdm3E qkj5L1ldGuAeQiBRvIbzmxW/x5oMb3W7oV+oOFox0on5AcaQof0Byc1YK+K93syhVqv0 UbRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fUjveHlGgNm/diVV0NMamOqX4Ql3U0cQQBkf82Pas8o=; b=K/41rkr7M+OsJvSfxpb+oawXi5G1fO9zCxZq/fF3okiRQv07xfxwjRdchocMlTpIBz dD0DBXacLuokxpZgosQUSdgRRhpiIvOGm1amINzsCkYmwxxyX9Eyt9Od7pQ4G7caNBpR iCY1Ge8BZkS3qthMKwxtOIWQ5RXjjJzuK3c3EtbVrYyEhsbRMOagNyw7Orzs0Olom44L HuE8NBXtQFdbFcYFvsmaUncz4nlvlIPpteU9XuN8eQbY5Ob8CCBI7Y9f7DK6O3ojm3Cf 5JRim98TQ/0RkxMdm/064/P/Tb/z3k1FeHe9H2sEuHwZqbQAXFKqmyR+bTBjtpOHoKox v4cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnrMTUsJpDmwz8iopsL+6PVz0zSdwedxwHHcVCWzXpKtnvk1o0rKgKcKMbRiMk4mSlaokl5rsQ9mC4Qb2bY0InrLZG/dA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.77.203 with SMTP id a194mr3659096lfb.62.1452867004069; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:10:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.144.36 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:10:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <301372A9-0333-4D56-B501-207C405C79F3@nic.cz>
References: <20160111.101526.1720014765007751699.mbj@tail-f.com> <20160111092831.GA41568@elstar.local> <20160111.112143.1731089672764861015.mbj@tail-f.com> <20160111104855.GA41658@elstar.local> <01d301d14ef1$814dcee0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CABCOCHTXa-XTkY73QhM3gzFbx0zQ_a24hijCz2HOaOQ9odL9DA@mail.gmail.com> <m2oacnnkbf.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz> <20160115114924.GA12322@elstar.local> <301372A9-0333-4D56-B501-207C405C79F3@nic.cz>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:10:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CABCOCHRrBSn7VX3dK54TZ_GES86ANn9xzzFQFue5sJF_d17EuQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141f2c4af1b0705295ff5dc"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/lKSbQP_B7lLqbl2q0psnkb4p8Wk>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:10:08 -0000
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote: > > > On 15 Jan 2016, at 12:49, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >> Does this solve any practical problem? Modules are imported based on > >> the module name and revision. On the other hand, it does create new > problems: > >> namespace URIs and their mappings to prefixes may be spread in many > >> places in the code, and these would have to be manually edited after an > >> I-D -> RFC transition. > >> > >> It would IMO be much better to use revision numbers rather than dates, > >> and adopt a convention, e.g., that modules in the I-D stage have > >> revisions 0.x that get bumped with each new revision of the I-D. > >> > > > > Lada, this is not how our current YANG 1.0 versioning and revision > > rules work and we are not going to change them in YANG 1.1 either. > > The rules we have do make a distinction between published modules and > > modules that are unpublished. > > I am not proposing it. The problem I'd like to get solved is proper module > revisioning already at the I-D stage so that implementations be able to > distinguish one revision from another. Appending DRAFT to the namespace URI > doesn't help anything. > > Changing the module name constantly does not help. It would be better to just keep using revision dates. Lada > > Andy > > > > /js > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C > > > > >
- [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations t.petch
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations t.petch