Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-lange-netmod-iana-timezones-00.txt

<Jonathan.Hansford@generaldynamics.uk.com> Thu, 28 June 2012 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <Jonathan.Hansford@generaldynamics.uk.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7E521F857F for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.443, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5s1rdgVwYgWf for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B1021F8501 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [85.158.136.35:56747] by server-5.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id DD/54-02722-B317CEF4; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:59:07 +0000
X-Env-Sender: Jonathan.Hansford@generaldynamics.uk.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-125.messagelabs.com!1340895547!30587829!1
X-Originating-IP: [217.33.196.17]
X-StarScan-Version: 6.5.10; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 12249 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2012 14:59:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.generaldynamics.uk.com) (217.33.196.17) by server-7.tower-125.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 28 Jun 2012 14:59:07 -0000
Received: from mail.generaldynamics.uk.com (HELO gdukadh864.uk1.r-org.net) ([172.16.40.142]) by mail.generaldynamics.uk.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2012 15:59:06 +0100
Received: from GDUKADH850.uk1.r-org.net ([172.16.40.138]) by gdukadh864.uk1.r-org.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:58:12 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:58:15 +0100
Message-ID: <83C941F7F59F3F42AC017AD1E650546206D4C3D4@GDUKADH850.uk1.r-org.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120628131213.GA55958@elstar.local>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-lange-netmod-iana-timezones-00.txt
Thread-Index: Ac1VPnI8PSHfPYfOSvqse0l/9+xtbw==
References: <20120627223703.1415.77965.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com><20120628053120.GA54197@elstar.local><20120628.103148.991980626356570748.mbj@tail-f.com><B0FB1FAC2C7B234D87DCEBF309F703C51BAA6B7D@CINMBCNA02.e2k.ad.ge.com><20120628130230.GA55885@elstar.local> <20120628131213.GA55958@elstar.local>
From: Jonathan.Hansford@generaldynamics.uk.com
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, jeffrey.K.lange@ge.com, mbj@tail-f.com, netmod@ietf.org
X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1
X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2012 14:58:12.0882 (UTC) FILETIME=[7095EF20:01CD553E]
Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-lange-netmod-iana-timezones-00.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:59:09 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
[mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de]
> Sent: 28 June 2012 14:12
> To: Lange, Jeffrey K (GE Energy); Martin Bjorklund; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action:
draft-lange-netmod-iana-timezones-00.txt
> 
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 03:02:30PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> 
> > > So that also is a bit arbitrary as well.  Should I leave the enums
in
> alphabetical order? Or should it match what the zone.tab file does?
> >
> > Any order is likely irrelevant over time. See below.
> >
> 
> Well, I realize this statement is not really helpful / correct. You
> can keept the enums defined in the order they are defined in the TZ
> database but then the value statements MUST be used and the numbers
> over time won't be assigned in a strictly increasing order. This means
> that YANG tools can use the definition order (if they are able to
> access it) or they might end up using the numeric value order, which
> will over time be increasingly meaningless.

Still learning here, but RFC6087 states:

If extensibility of enumerated values is required, then the
'identityref' data type SHOULD be used instead of an enumeration or
other built-in type.

So why are enums being considered over identityrefs?

> 
> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>



This email and any files attached are intended for the addressee and may contain information of a confidential nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that this email was sent to you in error and you should not disclose, distribute, print, copy or make other use of this email or its attachments. Such actions, in fact, may be unlawful. In compliance with the various Regulations and Acts, General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited reserves the right to monitor (and examine for viruses) all emails and email attachments, both inbound and outbound. Email communications and their attachments may not be secure or error- or virus-free and the company does not accept liability or responsibility for such matters or the consequences thereof. General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited, Registered Office: 21 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2DY. Registered in England and Wales No: 1911653.