IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-10

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Thu, 15 April 2021 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <01000178d30320e7-b744818a-bf65-40ef-b4bf-37578bed72d8-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625603A26CF for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iwzsK9WpU6v2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750DA3A26CD for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1618447901; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=nncAafoq+ILcLJluRKLbI99ftqDEvb54TF6ee/yVhm0=; b=RrgbGOiYzUjq1H6V8xfyTn0I0cbINAyQ+J8GTL3BLu2a11tuoRvGu6p8uYPYQHDE h5wmrQsfoVfLEg9y12U+JyL6QXvOacyMNxHINHI5hvPj4gSLBll0+DFDdPcJogb/C0A uVij/Lc8vdPsnhamhD9b+3nMCy9boUcbPG8y3RPI=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <01000178d30320e7-b744818a-bf65-40ef-b4bf-37578bed72d8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BC9F5822-4B5E-451D-B8E9-DA942C38A926"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:51:40 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR0702MB355740FD81E6CCFBE702FD22F0759@AM6PR0702MB3557.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
To: Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
References: <010001712ce4c5fe-04a059c3-ced3-4e6d-8389-5dd7c1257ac2-000000@email.amazonses.com> <010001712e483a1b-204d92e3-7046-46fb-b6b8-13d8ad4cb9ff-000000@email.amazonses.com> <DB7PR07MB40110143FEDD70AD8C9C22EEF0C00@DB7PR07MB4011.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <0100017160917518-a18954f3-8e57-4286-904a-5a3e9779ff31-000000@email.amazonses.com> <AM6PR0702MB3557E703380623B0BDAF33A5F0649@AM6PR0702MB3557.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <010001788ff302da-dcb9dc37-8e63-4ba1-9f82-5584e0e4f49a-000000@email.amazonses.com> <AM6PR0702MB355740FD81E6CCFBE702FD22F0759@AM6PR0702MB3557.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2021.04.15-54.240.48.93
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/pyE_ZSNdCAg5QUXJVGsUMHbr1Vk>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-10
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:51:47 -0000

Hi Balazs,

Please find my comments below.

K.


> On Apr 7, 2021, at 9:56 AM, Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Kent,
> Thanks for the thorough review and sorry for my absence and hence the earlier slow response.

Join the club ;)


> See answer below as BALAZS4. Removed already agreed parts.
> What is the next step?

Time for me to attempt the shepherd writeup again, and then publish it for IESG review.

K.


> Regards Balazs
>  
> From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>> 
> Sent: 2021. április 2., péntek 2:20
> To: Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com <mailto:balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>>
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [netmod] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-10
>  
> Please see below for responses.  (One question pending)
>  
> Kent // shepherd
> 
> On Mar 23, 2021, at 6:01 PM, Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com <mailto:balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>  
> Hello Kent,
> I am resuming my work on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format. 
> Regards Balazs
>  
>  
> From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>> 
> Sent: 2020. április 9., csütörtök 22:11
> To: Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com <mailto:balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>>
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [netmod] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-10
>  
> Hi Balazs,
>  
> BTW, I assume that you wish to publish this as-is and follow-up later with an update to adjust for the “semver” work - correct?
> K.
>  
> BALAZS4:  Yes, correct. 

Ack.


> Semver will take time and may undergo changes, so it would be too early to adapt this draft/RFC to it. However, two items already deal with Semver:
> The instance data files themselves will not have a Semver revision as the concept of compatibility is not defined for instance data.
> The YANG module ietf-yang-instance-data already includes:
>                                                      “... If other methods
>                     (e.g., revision-label) are defined to identify
>                     individual module revisions those MAY be used
>                     instead of using a revision date.”

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email