Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05

Qin Wu <> Mon, 19 August 2019 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E435120045 for <>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 03:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bbyuqkrcH4Oc for <>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 03:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5188012001A for <>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 03:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 03B75E3957876E98DC34 for <>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:00:17 +0100 (IST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:00:16 +0100
Received: from ([]) by ([fe80::b177:a243:7a69:5ab8%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:55:20 +0800
From: Qin Wu <>
To: Kent Watsen <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05
Thread-Index: AdVWb9jBrvFtuOF4QOq507Kml1QdNQ==
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:55:19 +0000
Message-ID: <>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:00:22 -0000

I know the LC has ended. But I have a few suggestion to draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05:
     import ieee802-dot1q-types {
      prefix dot1q-type;
     import ieee802-dot1q-types {
      prefix dot1q-type;
        "IEEE Std 802.1Q-2018: Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks.";
2. Suggest to add IEEE Std 802.1Q-2018 to normative reference.
3. As you described in draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model,
Sub-interface 'eth1.0' is not currently bound to any service and hence
traffic classified to that sub-interface is dropped.
Just want to confirm binding eth1.0 to l2vpn service is realized using ac attribute which is leafref to interface in the interface management model.
But as described in RFC8529, binding service to interface is realized by using the following:
   augment /if:interfaces/if:interface:
     +--rw bind-ni-name?   -> /network-instances/network-instance/name
   augment /if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4:
     +--rw bind-ni-name?   -> /network-instances/network-instance/name
   augment /if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6:
     +--rw bind-ni-name?   -> /network-instances/network-instance/name
I am wondering whether this is overdesign in RFC8529.

发件人: netmod [] 代表 Kent Watsen
发送时间: 2019年7月10日 8:15
主题: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05


This starts a twelve-day working group last call for draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05.

The working group last call ends on July 21 (the day before the NETMOD 105 sessions).  Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from authors.

Thank you,
netmod mailing list