IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] type equivalence

Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz> Mon, 22 February 2021 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691BB3A1266 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:22:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z29I7RHjs36e for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:22:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B60B3A1611 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:a88f:7eff:fed2:45f8] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:a88f:7eff:fed2:45f8]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77CA3140944; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:21:54 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1613989314; bh=teMHZ1coBBOoYKNKQ4cB5pPbCrvrJ3ONDNtnZbYTBkE=; h=To:From:Date; b=CSq7ovxRUqEnfVl954tX0rApJDCeem4Uci5nPyyrG25W+e1vZUmDnUtJI1xRsnUfG 14PH4DNjnowSMl8+evhIkViXEkYbyIzsRhetjzXiKIQImO/l65vVqE7MRJyRQRKzY0 YzG0poqSpH79mram73phuMGrB9kuETHjWOmZ9edE=
To: Martin Björklund <mbj+ietf@4668.se>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <20210219181858.arafmdtraq4ydir2@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <CD64BB41-E2BE-4B25-AA55-3B91D7C0D313@tzi.org> <20210222092455.qupjm2d4lpm4ay4n@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <20210222.104938.680142326480637892.id@4668.se> <552f005f-d636-702b-a82f-efd81abd5f45@nic.cz> <20210222101126.5v2jjvpzbzfhjwn2@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
From: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
Organization: CZ.NIC
Message-ID: <649579b7-8974-694e-4572-753384a93879@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:21:54 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210222101126.5v2jjvpzbzfhjwn2@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/u8VxM8HgE6V4apUGF9XnbXj7rQs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] type equivalence
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:22:56 -0000

On 22. 02. 21 11:11, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:00:36AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> 
>> But I thought that Jürgen's question was directed to the definition of
>> backward compatibility in the semver context.
> 
> No, the background is not semver here, it is "can we harmonize N
> different existing definition of "0..100" to one. And it seems the
> answer is "no", at least not in a backwards compatible way if people
> picked different base types.

+1

Lada

> 
> /js
> 

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email