IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Consensus Call Note for Requirements

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Mon, 14 September 2015 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA1F1B43BD for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ABEaOQA4Tjca for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0718.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::718]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 799301B40AC for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.140) by CO1PR05MB459.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.268.17; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:14:30 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.80]) by CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.80]) with mapi id 15.01.0262.022; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:14:29 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Consensus Call Note for Requirements
Thread-Index: AQHQ7AmBdT4y4mv21E6JWMsKgHQq2543JsKAgAAWngCAABYugIAEw7EA
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:14:29 +0000
Message-ID: <D21C8644.DA1ED%kwatsen@juniper.net>
References: <25E74703-B15C-4CE1-8FE3-A35EE875507B@lucidvision.com> <55F2B187.5030604@cisco.com> <6BE85265-0E47-4DED-A92D-B11A6FDDD08B@lucidvision.com> <55F2D71B.4050303@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <55F2D71B.4050303@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.14]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO1PR05MB459; 5:0RsDl7v8DqHinsAWabV8M0XtqaBMoXFsUHPErNPkLAiSHMuoCt6rpIFTtD+0pgPR0Lfnh9gb2gLmZrEb88Zow1kxqIO49bcJxnsIglFRq527vzDuVtvKsV4WXHYyRiKa5fK6ZQpnxGfA0p+T8H1hQA==; 24:tEivHFaP+PrN7rFEf6NlnbTVIZBQDibk2qNSIJpSf72WPH7swSrHG/A3G5x4jMzuxgNBU2iyayEkLW7hR4S1SMinpxUX9V9WATkr9WrFr/8=; 20:Tcae1vECNEyd/rZVWDKAlFeSsTjE4TpGtg/Q1Qm74h1FbH0FZeTsgIATbYmj8O2tReFJ0JfryGHlVEVtCJ3hLA==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB459;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR05MB459353F306D0C015B14162FA55D0@CO1PR05MB459.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001); SRVR:CO1PR05MB459; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO1PR05MB459;
x-forefront-prvs: 0699FCD394
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(24454002)(377454003)(479174004)(199003)(40100003)(122556002)(99286002)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(5001860100001)(101416001)(5001770100001)(81156007)(93886004)(97736004)(36756003)(66066001)(4001540100001)(4001350100001)(5002640100001)(105586002)(106356001)(106116001)(5001960100002)(189998001)(5001830100001)(62966003)(19580405001)(102836002)(10400500002)(15975445007)(68736005)(77156002)(5007970100001)(2950100001)(19580395003)(5004730100002)(64706001)(92566002)(2900100001)(46102003)(86362001)(83506001)(87936001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB459; H:CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C70E62C1AC31D14AA66CD827BE6189E5@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Sep 2015 18:14:29.2267 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB459
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uayRzVBtysKje2cgeiKtHX1L500>
Cc: netmod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Consensus Call Note for Requirements
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:14:35 -0000

These GitHub issues were opened per this thread:

  - https://github.com/netmod-wg/opstate-reqs/issues/1
  - https://github.com/netmod-wg/opstate-reqs/issues/2
  - https://github.com/netmod-wg/opstate-reqs/issues/3

Thank you Rob!

Kent


On 9/11/15, 9:28 AM, "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

>
>
>On 9/11/2015 8:09 AM, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
>>>> 3. Support for both transactional, synchronous management
>>>> >>   systems as well as distributed, asynchronous management
>>>> >>   systems
>>>> >> 
>>>> >>    a. For asynchronous systems, the ability to request a protocol
>>>> >>        operation to not return (i.e. block) until the intended
>>>> >>        configuration has been fully synchronized.
>>> > I'm not sure why 3 (a) is a requirement, or its unclear to me where
>>>this is specified in the openconfig-netmod-opstate draft.
>> 	Anees/Rob, can you guys please add some color to the above
>>descriptions to help clarify things for Robert?
>I see (3) but not (3.a) in
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01#section-4.2
>so am unsure how 3.a made it on the list.
>
>also, I don't object to 3.a if *users* say they need it.
>
>Lou
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>netmod@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email