[netmod] draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Tue, 26 March 2019 09:15 UTC
Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742DC1202CE; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 02:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.394
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.394 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.107, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=PgYxPiTP; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=FeCtQHVO
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L6_fLkEPf1Mw; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 02:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 124331202FA; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 02:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7993; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1553591723; x=1554801323; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=TbqCObZ8L5Ptjl4+Qpe0oaSZ+as8oYEulNSPbpkQH20=; b=PgYxPiTPeaXxWxk1PtNz9pP2wkH43t68v8tFwQYv69zehSwiTBzcEiNs K6VjF/t7M4G+m0uddlOdcq5a4z95erUx/f6Vr7SNpq6PvrP385Z4a0JGh ZDw0WR8gewcyajpQFipZRoa8lNxPq9KsgjG5lMnGpYeH3o/zTMotxeCYk c=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:UenMohfjk/HJVQBSOlojEuGMlGMj4e+mNxMJ6pchl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwGRD57D5adCjOzb++D7VGoM7IzJkUhKcYcEFnpnwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/dTYzHMFLUndu/mqwNg5eH8OtL1A=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CCBQCU7Jlc/5hdJa1kHQEBBQEHBQGBUQgBCwGBDi8pJwNoNj4ECycKhASDRwOEUopagjKSaYRJgS4UgRADVA0BASyEQA4LhQgiNAkNAQEDAQEJAQMCbRwBC4V0HQEBNwERAUoCBDAnBA6CXEsBgRFMAxUBAqIuAooUcYEvgngBAQWCR4JDGIIMCIEvAYsxF4FAP4E4DBOCF4UggyExgiaMc4QhHocpjEEJApM5GZQCix2TMAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBTTgogS5wFTsqAYJBggqDbopTcoEojgEBgR4BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,271,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="539883064"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 26 Mar 2019 09:15:21 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (xch-aln-010.cisco.com [173.36.7.20]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x2Q9FLxq020781 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:15:21 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:15:20 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:15:20 -0500
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 05:15:19 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TbqCObZ8L5Ptjl4+Qpe0oaSZ+as8oYEulNSPbpkQH20=; b=FeCtQHVO9DNUhh7BpH1d7md6lbmCcMh7uIT7j9NWI6viLZr3yBv2kvfZ1HBqno74cfH6aqE/vcqaHwk3yHNr17pd0MUAYzJolzXO833/n/rFijsXlkO+w+KaeXjr8dEju9ToVY3e2k0Qij9wJmNqKye/Mc2U8fCBlCh9wQ6jgp0=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.252.156) by MN2PR11MB3917.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.180.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1730.16; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:15:18 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d5b:81c5:6ab2:c5d]) by MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d5b:81c5:6ab2:c5d%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1730.019; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:15:18 +0000
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: "draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang@ietf.org" <draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang@ietf.org>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang
Thread-Index: AQHU47RufUSeb+AC002ZW4vAXwSz8w==
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:15:18 +0000
Message-ID: <1E3F911F-B9B8-4750-AEA3-3AC52E2EB215@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.6.190114
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rrahman@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.79]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7de26513-1984-4043-5161-08d6b1cb90f7
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600127)(711020)(4605104)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3917;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3917:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3917A1233CF0317299E917FFAB5F0@MN2PR11MB3917.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 09888BC01D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(366004)(346002)(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(14454004)(99286004)(486006)(9326002)(6506007)(25786009)(450100002)(4326008)(186003)(71200400001)(26005)(33656002)(2616005)(316002)(476003)(71190400001)(102836004)(58126008)(7736002)(97736004)(83716004)(2501003)(106356001)(4744005)(105586002)(53936002)(68736007)(36756003)(6436002)(256004)(6306002)(54896002)(2906002)(5640700003)(6916009)(6486002)(6512007)(82746002)(2351001)(81156014)(3846002)(8676002)(81166006)(66066001)(86362001)(8936002)(6116002)(478600001)(5660300002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3917; H:MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: DSSvuk9Jix6t2n771t5rLmZOMVLQfmz3xbEahAvfLVq+ZiK+RmzZ4ksmJ9SRmjXAVl6WA+ucnswnnEMleABB3RDfmUhX/4AAENG6VKWI7Z9on6V2TOx+XHs/NM/OfGPJ0KuSO7FRsI8Y5o1ayx7a8T2OrOyefHG0lUblcmLGrbLgzNW7w+eOGv6VBEc9dSq/GgnG2+xi8/ha+k5+0NcSi9ClbviPTbvsRukxgIcYuKZg9A49wtu86RTUUEZ59ZpUmQg4RN7lvMFyiO4FRmxuJCNQR+LV3EaDgfqDB8fPovZPbU6J9GRKH2/KW6MIyY1q5GMm6gLzKAwf4LBYqnZPjvOs6tM8dc0QE9Igt7ggx2IfTgoLRETj44xFB6fEDAi2/+s2DzQMQ74JcQVvMAa2OYw19GUCb0I3Ahd+UiWI2bA=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1E3F911FB9B84750AEA33AC52E2EB215ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7de26513-1984-4043-5161-08d6b1cb90f7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Mar 2019 09:15:18.5847 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3917
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.20, xch-aln-010.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/zDL9CcF47ly1LENibo8GWn4Ld4c>
Subject: [netmod] draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:15:33 -0000
Hi, Took a look at the draft, some comments/questions: 1. Use of instance-identifier, so we need to list all instances individually? 2. Is the only possible action a set operation? In some cases an action such as reset would be desirable, have you considered RPC? 3. There are errors in the example, e.g. name should be interface-state-exception (not interface-exception)? 4. The example has 3 interfaces [eth1, eth2, eth3] in the event target, 2 interfaces [eth1, eth2] in the trigger test and 1 interface [eth1] in the action. I don’t understand why. Regards, Reshad.
- [netmod] draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang Reshad Rahman (rrahman)