IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [newtrk] newtrk milestone done?

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> Thu, 16 December 2004 03:21 UTC

Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA26604 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:21:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBG2jCGo011287; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:45:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iBG2jCXY011282; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:45:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBG2jBUW010851 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:45:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfnjgl21 (c-24-1-97-29.client.comcast.net[24.1.97.29]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <20041216024505016007pbnpe>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 02:45:06 +0000
Message-ID: <004601c4e319$68b44a30$0200a8c0@DFNJGL21>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
To: newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
References: <20041215132139.C909818B2F4@newdev.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [newtrk] newtrk milestone done?
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 20:46:10 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Scott,

I agree with both of your readings... you didn't ask for positive 
feedback, but it never hurts to know that someone is following you :-)

Spencer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
To: <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:21 AM
Subject: [newtrk] newtrk milestone done?


>
> the newtrk charter includes the milestone:
> Dec 04 Determine if there is consensus to proceed with a new 
> document
> series to describe and define individual IETF technology standards
>
> it is my reading (as chair) of the discussion that the group has
> reached consensus that this is something we want to do - please
> let the list know if you disagree  (if we agree I will then ask that
> this milestone be marked done and change the date for the 
> documentation
> milestone to after the summer 2005 IETF meeting to give enough time
> to finalize the consensus on the details and to test things out by
> defining some ISDs.
>
> the charter also has the milestone:
> Dec 04 If the consensus was to create a new RFC cleanup process
> then submit an ID describing the process to IESG for publication
> as a BCP RFC
>
> a while back we determined that there was consensus to proceed with
> describing a cleanup process - I exchanged email with the authors
> (and AD) about the timing of the description document and we agreed 
> that
> the proposed process should be tested before its codified so I'm
> requesting that the milestone be reset to Aug 05 - that should give
> enough time to run at least one cycle of the process proposed in
> draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt
>
> Scott 


.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email