IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Decruft schedule (Re: [newtrk] updated newtrk agenda)

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 01 November 2004 12:55 UTC

Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA27618 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 07:55:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA1COK6Z014302; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 04:24:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iA1COKlK014301; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 04:24:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA1COIRG014277 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 04:24:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB53C621F5; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:24:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25865-07; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:24:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (162.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.162]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED56C61AD5; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:24:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 13:24:15 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: scott bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: Decruft schedule (Re: [newtrk] updated newtrk agenda)
Message-ID: <5B9EC08043D798C17E0B1996@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411011237510.8737@netcore.fi>
References: <20041030234021.4753D10B65D@newdev.harvard.edu> <E713E1172623C1859836D981@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411011237510.8737@netcore.fi>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--On mandag, november 01, 2004 12:40:02 +0200 Pekka Savola 
<pekkas@netcore.fi> wrote:

> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>>> cruft
>>>         should we decruft - chair                               10
>>>         decrufting details - Lear/Alvestrand                    25
>>>         reading: draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt
>>
>> If the consensus of the room is the same as in San Diego and we
>> should decruft, I will propose to the room that we send out a Last
>> Call for the document right after the meeting, with no further
>> changes or debate - either for Experimental procedure under
>> draft-klensin-process-july14 or for straight-out BCP status.
>>
>> I believe the value of getting this going is larger than the value of
>> further  debate on the details.
>
> IMHO, we should issue a show-of-hands or some other kind of consensus
> process on whether the people feel that the reasons why particular
> documents were considered 'crufty' should be documented in RFCs or not.

Suits me.
I guess there are more people who can be persuaded to voice an opinion on 
that in the room than on the list.

.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email