Re: Decruft schedule (Re: [newtrk] updated newtrk agenda)

[Pekka Savola <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>> cruft
>>         should we decruft - chair                               10
>>         decrufting details - Lear/Alvestrand                    25
>>         reading: draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt
>
> If the consensus of the room is the same as in San Diego and we 
> should decruft, I will propose to the room that we send out a Last 
> Call for the document right after the meeting, with no further 
> changes or debate - either for Experimental procedure under 
> draft-klensin-process-july14 or for straight-out BCP status.
>
> I believe the value of getting this going is larger than the value of further 
> debate on the details.

IMHO, we should issue a show-of-hands or some other kind of consensus 
process on whether the people feel that the reasons why particular 
documents were considered 'crufty' should be documented in RFCs or 
not.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html