[nfsv4] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-07: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 20 February 2020 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161D21200C1; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:14:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data@ietf.org, Thomas Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>, Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>, Brian Pawlowski <beepee@gmail.com>, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, beepee@gmail.com, nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.118.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Message-ID: <158216848908.17754.6609131313720933956.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:14:49 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/0IOSkGgZsCpCuieZwPaw3v8w4WU>
Subject: [nfsv4] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:14:49 -0000

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I would like to see a resolution of Barry's DISCUSS as well. In addition if you
are using division by 1024, I think the appropriate range needs to be
1KiB-256KiB instead of 1KB-256KB as defined in the draft.