Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv4.1

Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Tue, 19 October 2010 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC973A6831 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lO27DtG56SNm for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com (e7.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.137]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419593A67FF for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o9JFSSfQ015048 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:28:28 -0400
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o9JFiEM91265858 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:44:15 -0400
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o9JFiEbB020404 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:44:14 -0200
Received: from d01ml604.pok.ibm.com (d01ml604.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.90]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o9JFiEJ7020388; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:44:14 -0200
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikPzAvHotOFJ2ZgxftXk1jEnJBJd_PLetS+biHP@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E043D9D8EE3B5743B8B174A814FD584F0C98E09C@TK5EX14MBXC131.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <4CBD4A05.9050105@desy.de> <AANLkTikPzAvHotOFJ2ZgxftXk1jEnJBJd_PLetS+biHP@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 8861E42D:789C2C40-882577C1:00562D7D; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.1 February 07, 2008
Message-ID: <OF8861E42D.789C2C40-ON882577C1.00562D7D-882577C1.00566D72@us.ibm.com>
From: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:44:13 -0700
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML604/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 10/19/2010 11:44:13, Serialize complete at 10/19/2010 11:44:13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org, f.org%IBMUS@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv4.1
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:42:55 -0000

Hi Tigran,
We are all interested, can you post it to this email list.
Thanks, Marc.



From:
"William A. (Andy) Adamson" <androsadamson@gmail.com>
To:
Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
Cc:
nfsv4@ietf.org
Date:
10/19/2010 06:16 AM
Subject:
Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv4.1
Sent by:
nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org



On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Tigran Mkrtchyan
<tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> wrote:
>
> We did extensive pNFS test last couple of mounts which we present this 
week
> at Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics in Taipei.
> I can provide numbers and slides if you need.


Hi Tigran

Very interesting - please forward them to me.

Thanks

-->Andy

>
> Regards,
>    Tigran
>
> On 10/18/2010 10:30 PM, Spencer Shepler wrote:
>
> I am curious if anyone is interested and able to do a
> presentation at the upcoming WG meeting on 4.1 implementation
> status?  Given the nature of the interop testing (NDAs) I am
> not asking for an industry report but more of an experience
> so far and status for single implementations.  Covering
> things like: functionality implemented, issues found, issues
> unresolved, areas of concern, lessons learned for future work.
> That type of thing.
>
> Anyone interested?
>
> Thanks,
> Spencer
>
> p.s. Obviously, this could include NFSv4.0 as well. :-)
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>
_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4