Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv4.1
Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Tue, 19 October 2010 15:42 UTC
Return-Path: <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC973A6831 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lO27DtG56SNm for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com (e7.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.137]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419593A67FF for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o9JFSSfQ015048 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:28:28 -0400
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o9JFiEM91265858 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:44:15 -0400
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o9JFiEbB020404 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:44:14 -0200
Received: from d01ml604.pok.ibm.com (d01ml604.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.90]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o9JFiEJ7020388; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:44:14 -0200
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikPzAvHotOFJ2ZgxftXk1jEnJBJd_PLetS+biHP@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E043D9D8EE3B5743B8B174A814FD584F0C98E09C@TK5EX14MBXC131.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <4CBD4A05.9050105@desy.de> <AANLkTikPzAvHotOFJ2ZgxftXk1jEnJBJd_PLetS+biHP@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 8861E42D:789C2C40-882577C1:00562D7D; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.1 February 07, 2008
Message-ID: <OF8861E42D.789C2C40-ON882577C1.00562D7D-882577C1.00566D72@us.ibm.com>
From: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:44:13 -0700
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML604/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 10/19/2010 11:44:13, Serialize complete at 10/19/2010 11:44:13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org, f.org%IBMUS@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv4.1
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:42:55 -0000
Hi Tigran, We are all interested, can you post it to this email list. Thanks, Marc. From: "William A. (Andy) Adamson" <androsadamson@gmail.com> To: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org Date: 10/19/2010 06:16 AM Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv4.1 Sent by: nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> wrote: > > We did extensive pNFS test last couple of mounts which we present this week > at Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics in Taipei. > I can provide numbers and slides if you need. Hi Tigran Very interesting - please forward them to me. Thanks -->Andy > > Regards, > Tigran > > On 10/18/2010 10:30 PM, Spencer Shepler wrote: > > I am curious if anyone is interested and able to do a > presentation at the upcoming WG meeting on 4.1 implementation > status? Given the nature of the interop testing (NDAs) I am > not asking for an industry report but more of an experience > so far and status for single implementations. Covering > things like: functionality implemented, issues found, issues > unresolved, areas of concern, lessons learned for future work. > That type of thing. > > Anyone interested? > > Thanks, > Spencer > > p.s. Obviously, this could include NFSv4.0 as well. :-) > _______________________________________________ > nfsv4 mailing list > nfsv4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 > > > _______________________________________________ > nfsv4 mailing list > nfsv4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 > > _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
- [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv4.1 Spencer Shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… sfaibish
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… sfaibish
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… William A. (Andy) Adamson
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… Spencer Shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… Thomas Haynes
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… Tigran Mkrtchyan
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… William A. (Andy) Adamson
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… Marc Eshel
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… Spencer Shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv… Tigran Mkrtchyan