IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8276 (7004)

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Thu, 23 June 2022 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E1DC1858DA for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P8jei8eprPvn for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD228C1858DF for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id o10so28828368edi.1 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/ILCaRuWy+JQ0hZcgIzr07RL1U+simsj+wcefgUBTcM=; b=LEkzQQVe1uFXbzb1tfvDOpgX6lLkCMda+wajbjBSl+IBrkxU3qNQmnu50Knr9Vqm2K lLAx+tw6vLbQxulWkUcOeoptUZ/itnXqHQrRr7c17E32f2CnnhGY1JztcxQLB3cdlhde XTJn/UWU/IPzv0z0YjHE80/ImSMssBsNjxYY4D+25iSn5CpI+qhWRdfWkP4e8GSbonRA 99KRvL/7trjPgDlWpeKKiKLXtzQSeJ+tml+BhU2z9OYO2XjjHxh+b6sIKCsvUwmBdcGL WWjIxs+njfzo3CZkwbBRHdP6pRzSno4EgxqvocX0vI2cLN/rCxM2nIurQMVNSyDu2R+f 9csw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/ILCaRuWy+JQ0hZcgIzr07RL1U+simsj+wcefgUBTcM=; b=QSHq107DumMdIjrpSxVehtsfgES7UaN46EeLIHHdraiQ4UB6k3qXEpqmoZUATaufXv N24qnkpAQ1/qpkBhmWfrku1ctZpcPCl+ioaFaBUSXHKKZAE5aCGpDwYtYK9pTcmN/PEI 2Gi0fHsj8KaqsQAp2IXbJROTNG7ZwCmbOoXZm9XXxkSd62/QAMKszzi9MRZItdtmVUTX 8zKbRFFXVLMjgI9EtknQohVOR8XQ7SYLjdUMloEuhNYhfAceVnmUyH8nsXWJKabMpfuC 1CLK0O9n9WInlmbpvXviGEmwtyqnJkMAVrnC+8dgDdtpcBS486SH+zHGwyBu0szqJT2N TaVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/Vk+PP02/dEFEKhDdM59q6FiaFECD5eh0SMbhz6IuRFxke47LI v6g0n7HJm0KqJseh28so0/PgbLlFN2i8whx1rwiAsXuB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tKV8h+yMAG/RlzDoh3c5UuMycmRJms8UqxSRCRR3GRYX5/tmSsIGySgiQ/N5Xt/H2VgeLvpDtb0PEFAS/sIJk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:e88:b0:434:d7de:8d0b with SMTP id h8-20020a0564020e8800b00434d7de8d0bmr10975955eda.149.1655994721437; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220623121818.AAE5EAEA1@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220623121818.AAE5EAEA1@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:31:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jdqU=Xkt6rfeks0ro1VSQAgYmB6JSbniqFe7ZrD99sBDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, radchenkoy@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001f0d0205e21e5190"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/2sos_oUxQ3p9imXUqKIOzZPcDCY>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8276 (7004)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:32:07 -0000

Should be verified.  Nice Catch.

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 8:18 AM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8276,
> "File System Extended Attributes in NFSv4".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7004
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Yuri Radchenko <radchenkoy@gmail.com>
>
> Section: 8.4.5
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    | LISTXATTRS  | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION, NFS4ERR_DELAY, |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_INVAL, NFS4ERR_IO, NFS4ERR_MOVED,           |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG, NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,          |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP, NFS4ERR_NOXATTR,                   |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION, NFS4ERR_PERM,            |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG, NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,  |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG, NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,    |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, NFS4ERR_STALE,
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    | LISTXATTRS  | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION, NFS4ERR_DELAY, |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_INVAL, NFS4ERR_IO, NFS4ERR_MOVED,           |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG, NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,          |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP, NFS4ERR_NOXATTR,                   |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION, NFS4ERR_PERM,            |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG, NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,  |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG, NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,    |
>    |             | NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, NFS4ERR_STALE, NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL
>
> Notes
> -----
> Section 8.4.3.3. DESCRIPTION says about NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL status code:
>
> "If the server is unable
>    to return a single xattr name within the maxcount limit, the error
>    NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL will be returned to the client."
>
> But this status code not specified  in section 8.4.5.  Valid Errors for
> LISTXATTRS operation.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8276 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-xattrs-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : File System Extended Attributes in NFSv4
> Publication Date    : December 2017
> Author(s)           : M. Naik, M. Eshel
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network File System Version 4
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email