IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Draft RFC for ONC RPC over AF_VSOCK

Chuck Lever <chucklever@gmail.com> Thu, 12 October 2017 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <chucklever@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4A013453D for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lRvPMF5I973N for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB9BE124F57 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v132so9443475oie.1 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tIwuT/NMGPtV7+2AZBeRWXf3smthLxbq5/8LT1Bz94I=; b=IpNv3+D2wqn/8tgxKDEF1vAeP/cZN1EYVpCqi68DMbVMDwyxZ9Uu2ElMnPgZJAtD3V HTPulM6/fCmifEHVlVrcoOY+XYL7hfK4pkpnYqePSNlZKpXWyrRU/sTS2GD1NgOCcNHz Q9mrwBTT/MB1eHxndO2a+C+4BxE5zFH6ssropaEJX8W3SjLXNlaCqC9UTkfY82Xyxlxx JoZCH1c2FyAv8AY097y+PI0krKTCQfQwNToG2mXvYkAhUGCsAwmY6Nvj8z7Qx3IHLuZ8 6JuMM7fqDDihHnikBZCN/Wm3W/+DVZWlsximVU8HOMYR2a82VNuSgbJMWHEnM2IPuLhc o1YQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tIwuT/NMGPtV7+2AZBeRWXf3smthLxbq5/8LT1Bz94I=; b=HcbDOIIHnNuGkfgrqS7RdOPahsExwGicm8TZT/ykMeXa8tUOqk2YCXqrSft4ttoesn +bd2/qX66NsLH1VRxvRidMIm6ENVI34qrmrsorkSgAp1FpkDBQn3hGkA0hbmQWiBWxW2 FCRHY6tp38NDX7C2uOrXa+k0uytYnO26/GQwnVF3NgmQYuCEJqu7xyHEXenL8fbNZPCY v61P3khzbosjvIMftPheEIFsiOqDb/yuqTd3uG+knBGSSNW+KXUAglDno573jd1lpZVY 0OTZY+sXCFjXuwL6SgQZGbhWwFkOg6e2kZ68eCk5djbaqeRjpSsdUFGW3IlfPDvqm28P mZrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaV8YojltXGj3YYsO892TsIzZdAv0Y5MBgB93dVFXCvfcqVlimBr l4ob8vJRQaNTTRsnLGXBZ2UCVAYe
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SwRi+RLsAp4RdOTpEdlhGkeUqzJ+bms9xgI0S2OR9SKAssT1LMdFIg+pYqqlrKhvNkC+JWGQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.49.105 with SMTP id v38mr586643otd.442.1507826422231; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [25.115.127.149] (99-203-0-104.pools.spcsdns.net. [99.203.0.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u16sm7922651otc.18.2017.10.12.09.40.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-1D611ACA-1783-4A07-84AA-7DFC05FC0943"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Chuck Lever <chucklever@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15A421)
In-Reply-To: <20171012120814.GB5957@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:40:20 -0400
Cc: Matt Benjamin <mbenjami@redhat.com>, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D5A0AD89-0FA0-4057-849D-57BA54433710@gmail.com>
References: <20171005200835.GA31525@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <CAKOnarmreQp6c8qM7x=ohGf1sAoj53qbE0bNvKxzyWLiS=2zKw@mail.gmail.com> <20171012120814.GB5957@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/64jc_7ULvF7qn1aDAxt0NTN1TjA>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Draft RFC for ONC RPC over AF_VSOCK
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:40:26 -0000


> On Oct 12, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:50:55PM -0400, Matt Benjamin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> I have previously submitted patches that implement NFS client and nfsd
>>> support for the AF_VSOCK address family.  In order for this to be
>>> acceptable for merge the AF_VSOCK transport needs to be defined in an
>>> IETF RFC.  Below is a draft RFC that defines ONC RPC over AF_VSOCK.
>>> 
>>> My patches use netid "vsock" but "tcpv" has also been suggested.  This draft
>>> RFC still uses "vsock" but I'll update it to "tcpv" if there is consensus.
>>> 
>> 
>> I think "vsock" is the appropriate netid, not "tcpv."  Stream
>> orientation, if anything, is the general category containing TCP and
>> VSOCK, not the reverse.  But really I think it's just more clear.
>> 
>> I think this draft needs to be sent to the IETF NFSv4 working group
>> alias, nfsv4@ietf.org.
> 
> Thanks.  Will send the next revision properly formatted to the NFSv4
> working group.

Don’t do that. Please submit a personal draft via:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/

once you have appropriate permission from RH legal
counsel to contribute to the IETF. Then approach the
working group to introduce your submitted document.

Thanks!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email