IETF Logo Mail Archive

[nfsv4] Fwd: Draft RFC for ONC RPC over AF_VSOCK

Matt Benjamin <mbenjami@redhat.com> Thu, 05 October 2017 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mbenjami@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C031D1320D8 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MP7OaTpLOeEt for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68631320C9 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id i197so14492002ioe.9 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=S9eT1mNawSdpD0iqtrjUri8GwL87pDQxxLP9+vtzMcE=; b=obD/36KmxLuuorofzQULE/pa2FGTMQseoUrjoOl0VfFHMRxMUY+dMaAZsYaIudmPzr 4TeglR1oak53597mxKLCYXzt1OATEnKSCJU5JL8b9y6UbWowqzumXV5Bbm1pxwU4x/Pd uK33D+U7SO3Snq/OVKp/qZf8e4Ymxz8a48Tj64HOIbYaXxxtxSiI9inxdClhAeqvymDQ hKNSLXSgggnHZB7HJrOpN8h9pfxApoB7XmpqbwaPwmMWZcwLZ/Uy4FIa/AXjpYBj3pB9 M+bjmzaMQ+DJAmJVKszJx4yzxqQYtTQ9yxXoPuqhRn1BL57YMeZaFKXrjiEMnI10j/3t M9rA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXD5SoWssmV0w5peJHcMlSkKBe7Dla2QmAGIF7ZKBw6AIFVVY3h 8Gr2R/+GSH4SxoUEIbJzeMF4IEe0aH6vjg7Aw3DXRg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDxpJGsVcYQ/7zTxAXNX0cFRbTzqDbu7Xme6PVRGT+5C7oQWpdrs4nKvFZ5dBKutegrJnBGNLkEKWCK10QsXWs=
X-Received: by 10.107.33.17 with SMTP id h17mr39467247ioh.167.1507236758006; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.91.4 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKOnarmreQp6c8qM7x=ohGf1sAoj53qbE0bNvKxzyWLiS=2zKw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20171005200835.GA31525@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <CAKOnarmreQp6c8qM7x=ohGf1sAoj53qbE0bNvKxzyWLiS=2zKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Benjamin <mbenjami@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:52:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKOnarmUn6KWmFd2m722LhVXX+ogqf_dGxHRDpwQznCgcfVMqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/ABY5QDgKfalT_YD8sNfwbDjcbg0>
Subject: [nfsv4] Fwd: Draft RFC for ONC RPC over AF_VSOCK
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 20:52:41 -0000

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matt Benjamin <mbenjami@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: Draft RFC for ONC RPC over AF_VSOCK
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff Layton
<jlayton@redhat.com>, "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, Chuck
Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>, Trond Myklebust
<trondmy@primarydata.com>, Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>


Hi Stefan,

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> I have previously submitted patches that implement NFS client and nfsd
> support for the AF_VSOCK address family.  In order for this to be
> acceptable for merge the AF_VSOCK transport needs to be defined in an
> IETF RFC.  Below is a draft RFC that defines ONC RPC over AF_VSOCK.
>
> My patches use netid "vsock" but "tcpv" has also been suggested.  This draft
> RFC still uses "vsock" but I'll update it to "tcpv" if there is consensus.
>

I think "vsock" is the appropriate netid, not "tcpv."  Stream
orientation, if anything, is the general category containing TCP and
VSOCK, not the reverse.  But really I think it's just more clear.

I think this draft needs to be sent to the IETF NFSv4 working group
alias, nfsv4@ietf.org.

Matt

--

Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-821-5101
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309


-- 

Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-821-5101
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email