[nfsv4] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-10: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 16 April 2018 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C4B124207; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, spencer.shepler@gmail.com, nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.78.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152389784555.19590.7923299037011745780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:57:25 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/6pL7ZNHmUmtAsu0JxaFt3xSL4NQ>
Subject: [nfsv4] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:57:25 -0000

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for this.

I had one readability issue -- I find:
" control communication requirements:  are for a layout type the
      details regarding information on layouts, stateids, file metadata,
      and file data which must be communicated between the metadata
      server and the storage devices."

to be very hard to read. I tried for a while to break this up into multiple
sentences but was unable. It would be nice if the authors could succeed where I
failed...