IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] rfc5666bis and rpcrdma-bidirection progress update

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tue, 29 November 2016 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E734C129BF3 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 07:40:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKidEPJ-KGti for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 07:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946BF12964F for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 07:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id uATFeH1t030573 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:40:17 GMT
Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uATFeHXT004457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:40:17 GMT
Received: from abhmp0001.oracle.com (abhmp0001.oracle.com [141.146.116.7]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uATFeF4V015152; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:40:16 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-121.1015granger.net (/68.46.169.226) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:40:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR03MB28932EE72AB17813102AC8A3C78A0@MWHPR03MB2893.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:40:14 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <126557D0-8A2C-42A5-B9CE-2DF0118ECE6F@oracle.com>
References: <6ED97840-F1BF-4BBC-9C01-7F0A8943CB78@oracle.com> <MWHPR03MB289336B4D7E04D053D27D225C7A80@MWHPR03MB2893.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <4958FA14-2C47-4AEA-A72F-1C83F92DB4BE@oracle.com> <a3368e2b-ae35-ddef-80b3-d33646e46d88@gmail.com> <F924E4D7-3E26-4BFA-A82E-3713CDBC560A@oracle.com> <CADaq8jduTgJCsdhVmDV0wiiuhf0fkJXYYbsJ0znibipqFuQOZw@mail.gmail.com> <MWHPR03MB28934787F990928A41E84830C78A0@MWHPR03MB2893.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CADaq8jdpMCuq5k+k_Gjj4rC6iOgCt5xjwjorcPakRgsbqOWfMg@mail.gmail.com> <MWHPR03MB2893DA050246297A8E362D92C78A0@MWHPR03MB2893.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <5C52351B-09D7-4273-85E7-445B642FDDCC@oracle.com> <MWHPR03MB28932EE72AB17813102AC8A3C78A0@MWHPR03MB2893.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/7BKuKn5IdmT6H6NvtiR8G6VmoL8>
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] rfc5666bis and rpcrdma-bidirection progress update
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:40:20 -0000

> On Nov 28, 2016, at 5:33 PM, Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Chuck,
> 
> You comment:
> "It would help to get regular status updates on the document pipeline, whether there are any hold-ups, and what the non-executive members of the WG can do about them. IESG review processes are managed off the WG mailing list, thus many of us are not privy to progress on individual I-Ds, nor do we have a sense of what tasks there are remaining to do. The chairs are usually copied on all of this. Perhaps they could monitor and periodically reflect a summary to the WG.[Spencer] "
> 
> Sure, I can work to push out a summary for those time where documents are hung up on procedural or review comments, etc.
> 
> For those that are interested to follow along, all document status for the WG can be found here:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/nfsv4/documents/
> 
> Current state of the document, next steps, and what they mean are available via these pages.
> 
> For an individual document that has been or is going through IESG the specific comments and feedback are captured.  For example, the iSCSI layout document comments are listed here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout/ballot/

Much appreciated, Spencer!


--
Chuck Lever

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email