Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt

> On Aug 8, 2017, at 3:15 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Please review this revision to ensure the AD's comments have been
> > adequately addressed.
> 
> The only things I noticed were nits connected with the shift from referring to NFS RPC (version 2 and 3) "Programs" to making this singular since they use the same program.  In any case:
> 	• This has gone from capital to lower-case which doesn't match the rest of the document
> 	• If you scan for the word "Programs", one finds that there a number of other places where this is similarly pluralized.

Thanks, I will clean this up before -13.

> > Considerations section, to be submitted within the next week as
> > revision -13.
> 
> I'm not a triskadekaphobe but I did kind of wonder.  I looked at RFC8154 (the one that took a year after WGLC to get published) and it turns out to have been a -10. 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt
> > Date: August 8, 2017 at 2:36:09 PM EDT
> > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> > Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Network File System Version 4 WG of the IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : Network File System (NFS) Upper Layer Binding To RPC-Over-RDMA Version 1
> >        Author          : Charles Lever
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt
> >       Pages           : 19
> >       Date            : 2017-08-08
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document specifies Upper Layer Bindings of Network File System
> >   (NFS) protocol versions to RPC-over-RDMA version 1, enabling the use
> >   of Direct Data Placement.  This document obsoletes RFC 5667.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> This revision addresses AD Evaluation comments from Spencer Dawkins,
> except for the comment on the Security Considerations section. Some
> additional clean-ups were done which has resulted in section
> renumbering.
> 
> Please review this revision to ensure the AD's comments have been
> adequately addressed.
> 
> I plan to consider a replacement for the current Security
> Considerations section, to be submitted within the next week as
> revision -13.
> 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> 

--
Chuck Lever