Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Wed, 09 August 2017 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D034120227; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 17:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EvlfJ-yUu7aZ; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 17:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B5EE120720; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 17:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id v790jqDv028344 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 00:45:53 GMT
Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v790jqlj020125 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 00:45:52 GMT
Received: from abhmp0009.oracle.com (abhmp0009.oracle.com [141.146.116.15]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v790jp7q015728; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 00:45:52 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-171.1015granger.net (/68.46.169.226) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:45:51 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jeQ1LKsH4tf27Jm6hZbFTULT6LQgpZFWcELxY-CHAze1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 20:45:51 -0400
Cc: "nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org" <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <49F78465-5D51-44B4-A65C-695610EDBA61@oracle.com>
References: <150221736912.12436.8555189528435844625@ietfa.amsl.com> <8610FE8D-D0D0-4BE5-B5BD-EBE79E9D4C87@oracle.com> <CADaq8jeQ1LKsH4tf27Jm6hZbFTULT6LQgpZFWcELxY-CHAze1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/C0-5xsarJyz8rWhJTBghAC3tLVg>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:45:59 -0000

> On Aug 8, 2017, at 3:15 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Please review this revision to ensure the AD's comments have been
> > adequately addressed.
> 
> The only things I noticed were nits connected with the shift from referring to NFS RPC (version 2 and 3) "Programs" to making this singular since they use the same program.  In any case:
> 	• This has gone from capital to lower-case which doesn't match the rest of the document
> 	• If you scan for the word "Programs", one finds that there a number of other places where this is similarly pluralized.

Thanks, I will clean this up before -13.


> > Considerations section, to be submitted within the next week as
> > revision -13.
> 
> I'm not a triskadekaphobe but I did kind of wonder.  I looked at RFC8154 (the one that took a year after WGLC to get published) and it turns out to have been a -10. 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt
> > Date: August 8, 2017 at 2:36:09 PM EDT
> > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> > Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Network File System Version 4 WG of the IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : Network File System (NFS) Upper Layer Binding To RPC-Over-RDMA Version 1
> >        Author          : Charles Lever
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12.txt
> >       Pages           : 19
> >       Date            : 2017-08-08
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document specifies Upper Layer Bindings of Network File System
> >   (NFS) protocol versions to RPC-over-RDMA version 1, enabling the use
> >   of Direct Data Placement.  This document obsoletes RFC 5667.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-12
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> This revision addresses AD Evaluation comments from Spencer Dawkins,
> except for the comment on the Security Considerations section. Some
> additional clean-ups were done which has resulted in section
> renumbering.
> 
> Please review this revision to ensure the AD's comments have been
> adequately addressed.
> 
> I plan to consider a replacement for the current Security
> Considerations section, to be submitted within the next week as
> revision -13.
> 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> 

--
Chuck Lever