[nfsv4] CREATE_SESSION backchannel question
"Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com> Thu, 14 October 2010 15:06 UTC
Return-Path: <matt@linuxbox.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0773A6953 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.733
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.733 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.548, BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5eN8GPFU4XuQ for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aa.linuxbox.com (aa.linuxbox.com [134.215.213.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECCB3A68E7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com (thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com [10.1.1.55]) by aa.linuxbox.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id o9EF7ZKC031082 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:07:36 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16603FC83A2 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at linuxbox.com
Received: from thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MasfuXmXAQW2 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:07:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com (thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com [10.1.1.55]) by thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E733FC83A1 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:07:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:07:33 -0400
From: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com>
To: nfsv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <926671697.7347.1287068853883.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
In-Reply-To: <916289894.7345.1287068685090.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.1.1.213]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.5_GA_2180.CentOS5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.5_GA_2180.CentOS5_64)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (aa.linuxbox.com [10.1.1.1]); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:07:37 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [nfsv4] CREATE_SESSION backchannel question
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:06:20 -0000
Hi, I wondered a bit about the server's backchannel preferences in CREATE_SESSION, for example, if the server implementation would prefer (or even require) a dedicated backchannel. The server can accept or reject a client request to use the current connection as a forechannel and backchannel. If the server clears the backchannel flag, or the client did not set it, can the server expect that the client will offer a backchannel in a subsequent BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION (under its obligations under 2.9.2, item 3). Regards, Matt -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309
- [nfsv4] CREATE_SESSION backchannel question Matt W. Benjamin
- Re: [nfsv4] CREATE_SESSION backchannel question J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] CREATE_SESSION backchannel question J. Bruce Fields