IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Mon, 14 September 2020 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C481B3A0B96; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m29b4tIX-kiC; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C642F3A0B8A; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id p9so2240490ejf.6; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ogn4b57VtvQ+3K73cUqG/L2ZHEpbNYesfH6KuNYQzB0=; b=a0VwxsX0FIh22mEuemUBXqPBTropsIIUUxzY39V6rMzDhjxWcOtbo0Ag1/M3WRW1cf A8A8uqib0hqgUJ308eyxuILfZJRKFggSJHhwbQdcovoD13Lx0qoackk/o5G14OhsH5SO L5QDJOAbLLF0XU0HEh0hdSnEdy+8tsOLsRbrvndH3W3Cm4VzGHjgnRTx0CYMxsyaEX54 cV+pkNcoa5JzoKUaxWQQDt6R3GbnK+rXoVoD9+74Y+WD7LIXPCbiRWThBrXV9Kq9SnpR f7diBSZQ4dPRPJJ7HNUgR3ehP2kl/h5HBU0TlZl41Emr+JYSp6XonNczKW8Dsxbv275G KIJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ogn4b57VtvQ+3K73cUqG/L2ZHEpbNYesfH6KuNYQzB0=; b=bXNKax5052xgU5kS+CCXbD06YEIcfq5i3nAcxlied+mlimrQm6kn9xlMU3ZOk3DKfm CxICNul0g8wFxWWFQlmpGIGVIpmd7iom0ulMslf4Pt3aMwbraF+6mtQQqEyyAFv6yNK4 c4IBx8c66sxtkfMnNB2cM7ax+2vJqIp28Ym9Lz2hEtikZ9/xTyR8oBcXtaD6+pNh7GzS UvJXfCYGw7PMUzv+D1L8/BQYnrE6cDd64018FnB366BJNwurCxy4Qp3IOQiJTXBXnX1f ElnTSyyQRJA9VnWW8jIe+1TsASP4cKXpmTTxpFv3m3UgQUCpJDnsfmscPyrLc/24gID9 PhiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KfOa6+osc5QZig702lVD4BnTteUqGjqEvj7N1lJa1mkaciJmF n3bSxH0EDOqKlVjnhqjVV7poa4n9eN5RacZFFuIkR2mW
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZJgHwcDUU0dzhqmv2YuGKxPwh/+/wKjsXuRo5tpjfvsEcSQsIoNmdf4p49iJur7WfzAJQOLttqABBEhLEdI0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1e11:: with SMTP id g17mr16085618ejj.298.1600123612314; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159419140773.2153.2711644434582054796@ietfa.amsl.com> <603C4E4C-FE41-4D9C-8ECA-38006353DAAC@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <603C4E4C-FE41-4D9C-8ECA-38006353DAAC@oracle.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:46:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jeSWzBhYU8T7SGc7xXKdqo4k3YBnrH8ADeUi81h27j=yA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, nfsv4@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008240d405af4dcf38"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/EpNcR22PxgVDRixX-QW0EgxACZ4>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 22:46:56 -0000

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020, 12:50 PM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi Ben-
>
> I'm nearly done with the new text. I need some clarification below.
>
>
> > On Jul 8, 2020, at 2:56 AM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
>

> > Section 8.1
> >
> > Isn't it codepoint squatting to claim auth flavor 7 before IANA has
> > allocated it?  (This is usually a Discuss-level issue, but that part is
> too
> > long already so I left it here.)
>
> I agree it is slightly improper, but the authors were not aware of
> IANA's authority over RPC authentication flavors until late in the
> document's life cycle. It was a good faith oversight.
>

I think everyone  accepts that.

>
> I believe we have IANA's permission at this point to use the value 7.
>

It's best to ask them.  If they don't agree, we can ask for an early
allocation.


> Is there a text change needed here?
>

There might be.


>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email