IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Adjustomg milestones to address Benoit's comments

Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com> Tue, 10 October 2017 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sshepler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61CF1345B7 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bY-vmO1bK1cx for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01on0102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60D0E126B6E for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=6I8bW+iM4opN16hSMxZbpxgaAjRaJANZZfIvtp5/M80=; b=ZrMwcrp6QOSxn+yitDcIbZBmSnY6LPDqYIHFoI5fEN+CbiV6jQHACH0UTziaOuI4ykzvog8BBECEpqadllfA7i727hvcz9P4DW+CGq6vkurwEtSgBaXg+FMRhI78dAsuRZSK5Nw009bFwgxYy9VGLCV6XMJCX2L/fmSkv0x9cPI=
Received: from MWHPR21MB0157.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.173.52.15) by MWHPR21MB0511.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.172.95.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.156.0; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:38:59 +0000
Received: from MWHPR21MB0157.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.52.15]) by MWHPR21MB0157.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.52.15]) with mapi id 15.20.0156.001; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:38:59 +0000
From: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
CC: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] Adjustomg milestones to address Benoit's comments
Thread-Index: AQHTNShBHrfztFFg3kyuwtxpOz+R2aLdYzYAgAAPvjA=
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:38:59 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR21MB0157E356EE968E2C8B8AE36DC7750@MWHPR21MB0157.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CADaq8jen_e1PwJwdV_kGDJaznvtZHOGqhThnvw-x=xN8KvPbdA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-eFox6FiTcLSvmgw7EVaBVn6cZGDiD+Y7Ae72Ld=2jn_Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-eFox6FiTcLSvmgw7EVaBVn6cZGDiD+Y7Ae72Ld=2jn_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:f::678]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR21MB0511; 6:RUIbpqWOckGhMTYZM9yP2qaTgWPeaKlBixCIP42ot7i0MxILliKcWenN7y9fO7M0d/u52hm9mPjKOX3Dyw02KJljFvPRvkpc3VMtdWkwqlm+ux9qxIVmynKou0uVdpiS5vQsN4qWatvDTMKFPA/d1bBjTMXVXBqvbYt7lWxZs3G0G4qQkKvoeuMSOORQMNIrJuQQOQ7oQ4bGn4TVc/EtHqxeJBev/fd8egsV2qriprW+pgpo2lC95UoKXDPMzmD2Rj9a2HB8RjKaRFi4JL2bmrkpKQJzgwEXT9iWEuO7YBWefnHEzevmIpwzFfvJo2p6CZKx1g2HRTBqS7fNtGMU2w==; 5:BcuRntccrzU+SUgfArQTO8X5Rp+Rt67zdA34BsKgQRI4krhpfuKfmT/N+rV7QnszopUKx+AdC5pe10vZ7AiX6ugjotJ9zRjTEmDG2v+sCP45NYpO2hKMYrFMcYH1Ia1o59WWiAiRfNahWOz6Wnyu/Q==; 24:fqM8adxd6wjyJvI+JKLZHjw0lY/AaRLyv2uGL44JCQCjCrEPRD/Lpn/ZmPCSNnTOD5pxFjaPc7iAq41/rDzIkr5Eol14vPgLrCH7B6VW2us=; 7:R0bASNKZboYZF8O8S6nfDo6Z98wjQvOPvhzBffUAG4fyWD+GVSBVgVk4I6tOIMe0401X6ovlWP77laHqwyI+wn2WH91LtFnPzQbjFuDva9PR8s3dl8vZxLBT8magmv7eSq+5x7CJyMnTqnVnlAO3/9g5E99/1IyrmdNMfgDtBky1FgdcLWAvjah+6gWd73Tl8kGU2JKn1l6fUdSHfPVWKw2zTn/tSQABOMrWOvdkB7s=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 21482fd2-7dc2-4553-34fe-08d51005ca2f
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254152)(48565401081)(2017052603199)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0511;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR21MB0511:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR21MB05113F66004BCCC1F4E537D3C7750@MWHPR21MB0511.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(61425038)(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0511; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0511;
x-forefront-prvs: 04569283F9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(47760400005)(24454002)(199003)(377454003)(189002)(7696004)(74316002)(3280700002)(39060400002)(4326008)(3660700001)(53546010)(33656002)(5660300001)(22452003)(316002)(7736002)(105586002)(14454004)(2950100002)(106356001)(2900100001)(97736004)(110136005)(10090500001)(229853002)(189998001)(77096006)(8936002)(6116002)(478600001)(790700001)(102836003)(6436002)(68736007)(8990500004)(86362001)(6506006)(8676002)(86612001)(81156014)(81166006)(19609705001)(101416001)(50986999)(6246003)(53936002)(2906002)(76176999)(54356999)(6306002)(54896002)(9686003)(236005)(55016002)(99286003)(10290500003)(25786009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR21MB0511; H:MWHPR21MB0157.namprd21.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sshepler@microsoft.com;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MWHPR21MB0157E356EE968E2C8B8AE36DC7750MWHPR21MB0157namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 21482fd2-7dc2-4553-34fe-08d51005ca2f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Oct 2017 17:38:59.3933 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR21MB0511
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/KnUCHjQybtkNuNDsJN277Kn16GY>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Adjustomg milestones to address Benoit's comments
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:39:09 -0000

Thanks, Spencer D.

From: nfsv4 [mailto:nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 9:43 AM
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Adjustomg milestones to address Benoit's comments

Dear NFSters,

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:28 AM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com<mailto:davenoveck@gmail.com>> wrote:
Benoit's comments could be read as suggesting two milestone's per document,  but I've continued to use the one-milestone-per-document framework suggested by David Black as more manageable and understandable.  In shifting most milestones from WGLC to "submit final" I've added three months per milstone,assuming that the documents will have sufficient review before entering WGLC to avoid major issues arising at that time.  The one document that retains a WGLC milestone is one that may well never be published as an (informational) RFC, although the working group is free to decide otherwise:

In any case, the following is a proposed replacement section.

========================================================================
|   Date  |                Milestone                                   |
|---------+------------------------------------------------------------|
| 6/2018  | WGLC for draft-ietf-nfsv4-migration-issues (Informational) |
|---------+------------------------------------------------------------|
| 6/2018  | Submit final document describing use of NVMe in accessing  |
|         | a pNFS SCSI Layout (as Proposed Standard)                  |
| 11/2018 | Submit final document describing NFSv4.0 trunking          |
|         | discovery (as Proposed Standard)                           |
| 1Q2019  | Submit final document describing NFSv4.1 trunking          |
|         | discovery (as Proposed Standard)                           |
| 1Q2019  | Submit final document describing Transparent State         |
|         | Migration in NFSv4.1 (as Proposed Standard)                |
| 2Q2019  | Submit final document describing CM private data           |
|         | convention for RPC-over-RDMA version 1 (Informational)     |
| 3Q2019  | Submit final document describing pNFS RDMA Layout (as      |
|         | Proposed Standard)                                         |
| 4Q2019  | Submit final document defining RPC-over-RDMA Version 2     |
|         | (as Proposed Standard).                                    |
========================================================================

I saw an "OK with me" from Spencer (S), and no objections, so I've approved these in the datatracker.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email