IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Agenda for nfsv4 working group meeting Prague July 20

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Mon, 10 July 2017 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C3C131448 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fOX0TEnTme79 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4EBA12F3D6 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserv0021.oracle.com (aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id v6AEInlJ021770 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:18:49 GMT
Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v6AEImG4015076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:18:48 GMT
Received: from abhmp0012.oracle.com (abhmp0012.oracle.com [141.146.116.18]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v6AEImvK005650; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:18:48 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-171.1015granger.net (/68.46.169.226) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:18:47 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jfEg2UYH1vVXjtc4cqawPofUdwc+T5X5w114UNS+jZW1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:18:46 -0400
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DAA343BB-F318-44C8-95FF-1D139BC8885A@oracle.com>
References: <CAN0E48cY+CSj+b8DtCW9Fiz3sMq4vixdLSkCMcH11YKJmSYpxw@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jfEg2UYH1vVXjtc4cqawPofUdwc+T5X5w114UNS+jZW1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Pawlowski <beepy@purestorage.com>, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/My7St97fBEZxlWdLw8VPACOijqA>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Agenda for nfsv4 working group meeting Prague July 20
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:18:52 -0000

> On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:53 AM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'll also be in Prague Sunday.

Me too. A gentle request to keep arrangements for ad hoc recharter
meetings on the list, so others may attend! Thanks.


> I have put together a short presentation regarding the re-charter discussion.  Lately I've been focusing on SECDIR's comments about the existing security considerations section in RFC7530.  Let's get together some time (how about Monday morning?) and co-ordinate our presentations to avoid overlap.
> 
> So far, with regard to the re-charter I've kept the response to these security issues pretty minimal.  It is limited to us saying that, as part of maintenance we will try to meet IESG expectations in this regard, while allowing us to do extensions "to meet new security challenges".
> 
> My worry is that this might not be enough and that the working needs to consider something more substantial.  I don't think we can arrive at a new direction for NFSv4 security at IETF99 but at least we need to raise the issue of a possible change now to get some idea of what might be possible.  It would help if we got more specifics about what SECDIR is looking for.  If we could set up some meetings with SECDIR before Thursday, we would have a better framework for the working group meeting.  Alternatively, it would help to have some SECDIR people attend our meeting and take part in the discussion.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Brian Pawlowski <beepy@purestorage.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dave N. for driving discussion.
> 
> I will be posting this to IETF meeting site. Please note that the agenda includes bashing to make adjustments at meeting.
> 
> I will be in Prague on Sunday before hand. Would like to curl up with people to go over recharter discussion before Thursday to make sure I have a good strawman. Again Dave N. did  great job of teeing this up (look back on e-mail thread if you missed this).
> 
> beepy
> in Munich
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

--
Chuck Lever

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email