IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Agenda for nfsv4 working group meeting Prague July 20

Brian Pawlowski <beepy@purestorage.com> Mon, 10 July 2017 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <beepy@purestorage.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8213B1270A3 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=purestorage.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bmzaBc9e2xMq for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x230.google.com (mail-ua0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8B1126C3D for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x230.google.com with SMTP id w19so56174354uac.0 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=purestorage.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2gLKaVitglQxaV0zPnLG+1s2vNxbvnr59w6CxzN2xpE=; b=L70qpc0I6pE0A4P8vTYtERmC+ZdPh9EiaS2nsCFwNdENk+0w26N5eUbwKJEpeEgK6m 03BqsD1jQgfWx7tQEwzm+eVm8bEPpa7GGBXot/GKn6Au6kuFUG5kBNEEBbr1qaPnlhLB TKAhQPoBDfSDmZGMBCGs22YXuJOAUEJPQBh68=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2gLKaVitglQxaV0zPnLG+1s2vNxbvnr59w6CxzN2xpE=; b=MJPjqbRcZumg6MhT24bwx+BMxlJEZz/QVMMLcLDPGsF2eVDniDnOAtzY8m7s6Ms7r6 3SCRRUcRywJIJxBcyDIXD952M6AUX778EAaWNaxcELDhvHqsaqxQKhEFe7tgPEPjBzTR mGwR7iUISD/WLP66j1fEyAtDDvEs82lntsr5MkRgu8LUF1vdB6aEQegPR31ZPimoom/f p2wFIP/IRzhT7mmCJgqGVIa90AC8iV8RC+SVIdF7O28ptYCLWOAbVVZ17ldZ3T7eBjDu 79GQqN8PMu8pMTXQpGxfIg6Svehg20Q5JTnQG90iLrDs5gl0gg47pngHXGLXs3BIRnjt Nw8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112d/nbU7/OzjPXZug5EyfSU9XsaA1OZ2+Z7gNfPiWTDyS8Yax2r mwbselDUtIaHE04ogfqihVEtth4UHq8M
X-Received: by 10.159.39.227 with SMTP id b90mr8929903uab.105.1499698400064; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.185.16 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jdyzQBayaKhnxy_K1ZKf5xzZPm6h45Q+=_bZ+FpThDDAQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN0E48cY+CSj+b8DtCW9Fiz3sMq4vixdLSkCMcH11YKJmSYpxw@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jfEg2UYH1vVXjtc4cqawPofUdwc+T5X5w114UNS+jZW1g@mail.gmail.com> <DAA343BB-F318-44C8-95FF-1D139BC8885A@oracle.com> <CADaq8jdyzQBayaKhnxy_K1ZKf5xzZPm6h45Q+=_bZ+FpThDDAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Pawlowski <beepy@purestorage.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:53:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN0E48dmkuhbXKp=U7GR-sw3RhvNvsTH4TbFCY-qnnNv6CY16A@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1244a26814a60553f7be5d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/YNDMiqyLuQIiHWjToz3W_qwY05M>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Agenda for nfsv4 working group meeting Prague July 20
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:53:23 -0000

So... let's definitely not call this a meeting. We'll have one of those on
Thursday.

But I will have office hours from 6-7pm in the conference hotel. You will
find me sitting near the lobby.

You can send me e-mail if you have difficulty locating me... I will be
checking it all the time between those hours.

beepy


On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:43 AM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:

> ad hoc is better than post hoc :-)
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:53 AM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'll also be in Prague Sunday.
>>
>> Me too. A gentle request to keep arrangements for ad hoc recharter
>> meetings on the list, so others may attend! Thanks.
>>
>>
>> > I have put together a short presentation regarding the re-charter
>> discussion.  Lately I've been focusing on SECDIR's comments about the
>> existing security considerations section in RFC7530.  Let's get together
>> some time (how about Monday morning?) and co-ordinate our presentations to
>> avoid overlap.
>> >
>> > So far, with regard to the re-charter I've kept the response to these
>> security issues pretty minimal.  It is limited to us saying that, as part
>> of maintenance we will try to meet IESG expectations in this regard, while
>> allowing us to do extensions "to meet new security challenges".
>> >
>> > My worry is that this might not be enough and that the working needs to
>> consider something more substantial.  I don't think we can arrive at a new
>> direction for NFSv4 security at IETF99 but at least we need to raise the
>> issue of a possible change now to get some idea of what might be possible.
>> It would help if we got more specifics about what SECDIR is looking for.
>> If we could set up some meetings with SECDIR before Thursday, we would have
>> a better framework for the working group meeting.  Alternatively, it would
>> help to have some SECDIR people attend our meeting and take part in the
>> discussion.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Brian Pawlowski <beepy@purestorage.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks Dave N. for driving discussion.
>> >
>> > I will be posting this to IETF meeting site. Please note that the
>> agenda includes bashing to make adjustments at meeting.
>> >
>> > I will be in Prague on Sunday before hand. Would like to curl up with
>> people to go over recharter discussion before Thursday to make sure I have
>> a good strawman. Again Dave N. did  great job of teeing this up (look back
>> on e-mail thread if you missed this).
>> >
>> > beepy
>> > in Munich
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > nfsv4 mailing list
>> > nfsv4@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > nfsv4 mailing list
>> > nfsv4@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>>
>> --
>> Chuck Lever
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email