[nfsv4] [Errata Rejected] RFC5531 (4099)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 16 December 2015 21:54 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74F91A8BC4; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:54:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nveD5wdxFif5; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:54:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867021A8BC3; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:54:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id AE91A18019E; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:51:51 -0800 (PST)
To: techtonik@gmail.com, robert.thurlow@sun.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20151216215151.AE91A18019E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:51:51 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/PNltCFD3FpK4zdvG_7STZSHutt0>
Cc: mls.ietf@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: [nfsv4] [Errata Rejected] RFC5531 (4099)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:54:21 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5531, "RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5531&eid=4099 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: anatoly techtonik <techtonik@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2014-09-05 Rejected by: Martin Stiemerling (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- This document describes the Open Network Computing (ONC) Remote Procedure Call (RPC) version 2 protocol as it is currently deployed and accepted. Corrected Text -------------- Notes ----- The document doesn\\\\'t describe UDP and TCP port number 111, which is used to make initial connection for RCP services discovery and port mapping. Port mapping is an essential part of protocol without which ONC RPC services can\\\\'t work. RFC doesn\\\\'t describe 111 is hardcoded number or can be changed. Doesn\\\\'t say that servers typically listen on both UDP and TCP 111 (Linux nfs-kernel-server). --VERIFIER NOTES-- This RFC is solely describing the RPC protocol and not the underlying transport that might be used. -------------------------------------- RFC5531 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis-13) -------------------------------------- Title : RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 Publication Date : May 2009 Author(s) : R. Thurlow Category : DRAFT STANDARD Source : Network File System Version 4 Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5531 (4099) RFC Errata System
- [nfsv4] [Errata Rejected] RFC5531 (4099) RFC Errata System