[nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5531 (4099)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 05 September 2014 07:55 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DB91A04F8 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5q6oXmZVb7_s for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A571A04B6 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 01269180450; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: robert.thurlow@sun.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, mls.ietf@gmail.com, spencer.shepler@gmail.com, beepy@netapp.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140905075443.01269180450@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:54:42 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/Z_YlYWEhfoBo5sI-oExUNv14HbI
Cc: techtonik@gmail.com, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5531 (4099)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 07:55:34 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5531, "RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5531&eid=4099 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: anatoly techtonik <techtonik@gmail.com> Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- This document describes the Open Network Computing (ONC) Remote Procedure Call (RPC) version 2 protocol as it is currently deployed and accepted. Corrected Text -------------- Notes ----- The document doesn't describe UDP and TCP port number 111, which is used to make initial connection for RCP services discovery and port mapping. Port mapping is an essential part of protocol without which ONC RPC services can't work. RFC doesn't describe 111 is hardcoded number or can be changed. Doesn't say that servers typically listen on both UDP and TCP 111 (Linux nfs-kernel-server). Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5531 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis-13) -------------------------------------- Title : RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 Publication Date : May 2009 Author(s) : R. Thurlow Category : DRAFT STANDARD Source : Network File System Version 4 Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5531 (4099) RFC Errata System
- [nfsv4] [Errata Rejected] RFC5531 (4099) RFC Errata System